Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-02-2018, 01:48 PM
 
Location: Austin
15,638 posts, read 10,396,089 times
Reputation: 19549

Advertisements

trump derangement syndrome is real. I've seen tds in real life. anyone who reads this forum regularly can name posters who suffer from it.

 
Old 06-02-2018, 01:50 PM
 
Location: Just over the horizon
18,461 posts, read 7,094,796 times
Reputation: 11707
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Doll View Post
FatBob, your post has absolutely no relation to the words RedZin posted.
The relation is denying that the left is defending MS-13 .

The relation is that Trump calling them animals is somehow abnormal.

Given what MS-13 has done and is capable of, the term "animals" is being generous.

The relation is that the Left is making excuses for Samantha Bee calling Trump's daughter a c*** and trying to make it relative to things that Rosanne Barr said....

It has nothing to do with what Rosanne said....it's a completely separate issue and the only reason the Left is defending her use of the term is because it's being used against Tump/Trump's family.

If it had been ANY Conservative using that word about ANY Liberal female they would be LIVID and calling for their head on a stake.
 
Old 06-02-2018, 01:56 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,745,785 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by texan2yankee View Post
trump derangement syndrome is real. I've seen tds in real life. anyone who reads this forum regularly can name posters who suffer from it.
Looking ahead, it’s possible that Republicans in 2018 and President Trump in 2020 could win based on solid achievements. But their chances will be better if Democrats can’t shake off their bad case of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

democrats-dangerous-case-of-trump-derangement-syndrome
 
Old 06-02-2018, 02:08 PM
 
Location: My House
34,938 posts, read 36,270,562 times
Reputation: 26552
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzarama View Post
I'm jumping right in because I use TDR. I use it when, no matter what the subject, a post somehow manages to bring Trump into the conversation. imo, that's a bigger nuisance. The same thing happened with Obama. ODS:

https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/20...rome-is/207943

ODS & TDS won't make it into the next DSM.
It's a free country so of course you can use either expression any time you like, but plenty of people use it every time someone is critical of Trump in a thread ABOUT Trump and it sounds like they think this is some sort of legitimate syndrome, which... as you said... it's not going to make it into the DSM 6.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
 
Old 06-02-2018, 02:11 PM
 
Location: My House
34,938 posts, read 36,270,562 times
Reputation: 26552
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Bully View Post
I think the mother of a shooting victim has every right to voice her opinion of what it felt like to her, personally, to speak to the president about the murder of her child.

There's no "syndrome" attached to it. This is clearly how he came across to her.

He's not known for his elocution, that's for sure.

So... it's not like she went on a long rant about everything to do with him from what he said to what color underwear she suspects he wears.

If I spoke to a sitting president (or, hell, even a past one unless that president had dementia) and they left me feeling like I'd not been speaking to a thoughtful, responsible adult, I'd probably complain about it, too. She just lost her child.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
 
Old 06-02-2018, 02:15 PM
 
Location: My House
34,938 posts, read 36,270,562 times
Reputation: 26552
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwynedd1 View Post
Yep ya do. The classic signs are irrational thoughts when ever the name Trump comes up. You tell me Trump is a con man.
Yet, nearly all politicians have been caught lying and stretching the truth. The fact that trump uses embellishments does not mean he makes more of them. When everyone knows , its not manipulation. Huge means maybe a little bigger. Everyone knows.

Ask yourself how public servants like the Clintons are worth $100 million . Have you ever read any political philosophy? The Machiavellian formula is the tyrant seeks wealth were the established wealth seeks recognition. The threat from the Trump class is not typically "stealing". Its something that would be grandiose but ill advised because they seek glory . Its going to be impossible to have no influence. Tony Rezco and Obama? Plenty of room for partisanship but hardly a smoking gun. Yet only when Trump has these timing issues is he lining his pockets.



I am free to say you have the syndrome. Your position is not rational and its full of bias.


In my opinion you are not really qualified to be posting . If a birther said "I don't think Obama could drive a bus" , would you be impressed? Yet you just did the Trump version of it. That is the derangement syndrome.
Actually.... if you keep on telling me I have a mental disorder, you're probably attacking me personally, and that's a violation of the TOS, so no... you probably do not have the right to keep telling me that I, personally, have some sort of mental disorder just because I don't like Trump and you do.

I am not talking about Clintons or Bushes or Obamas here. I am talking about Trump. I have never liked him. He comes across as full of himself, sleazy, and generally of poor manners.

I thought that before he ever decided to run for office. My opinion as far as that goes is NOT political.

I just don't like him.

If you must drag the Clintons into this, I never thought much of Bill's philandering, but he's affable enough as a person outside of that part of his personality and if Hillary could live with it, it wasn't any of my business unless he had some sort of charges brought against him for rape or assault.

And, that's my opinion of the Clintons. Do I think all politicians are into it for money and prestige? Sure.

Do I dislike all of them entirely? Nah.

Do I dislike Trump entirely? Yes. But, I did before he ever tried to play politician.

That's all. It's not partisan. I just think he's a jackass.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
 
Old 06-02-2018, 02:17 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,745,785 times
Reputation: 13868
On one MSNBC talk show, the panelists predicted a historic defeat for Trump. MSNBC host Rachel Maddow confidently and laughingly made predictions about Trump’s trouncing defeat at the hands of Clinton. There were many other highly confident election predictions of Trump’s defeat all over the internet and in the media, both national and international.

Then, Trump elected president, there were emotional crackups. On the internet, people crying and screaming and cursing the election results, celebrities claiming they would leave the country. Colleges had cry-ins and gatherings for primal screams. Students were provided therapy dogs, coloring books, Play-Doh, and videos of playful kittens and puppies. The ongoing liberal response to Clinton’s defeat. They call it Trump derangement syndrome.

Evidence of continuing Trump derangement syndrome can be found in the calls for his impeachment by members of Democrat Congress... Maxine Waters, Al Green, and Brad Sherman.

The accusation of Russian collusion started with a Russian dossier that the Hillary camp paid for ... Russia, Russia, Russia and on and on, yet still no evidence. Next setting their sites on a porn ho while liberals continued to tune in daily in hopes that she will bring Trump down (keeping liberal media viewership up and making liberal pundits rich).

More evidence is standing for something but when Trump agree's immediately being against it. Of course I could go on and on...
 
Old 06-02-2018, 02:17 PM
 
Location: My House
34,938 posts, read 36,270,562 times
Reputation: 26552
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELOrocks17 View Post
Good points--and spot on.
What do any of those points have to do with Trump?

Nothing.

I don't care if anyone thinks Obama can drive a bus. That's pretty much the point. I am not PERSONALLY offended if people don't like Obama.

I don't care if they like him or not.

Why should I? I am not him.

I have nothing invested in other people's opinions of him.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
 
Old 06-02-2018, 02:19 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,745,785 times
Reputation: 13868
There is a treatment for Trump derangement syndrome. Instead of watching MSNBC, CNN, ABC News, NBC News, and CBS for your "news", try tuning in elsewhere or getting another point of view. By no means do I recommend that liberals go cold turkey on the mainstream media. They should start out by listening to other media for only about five minutes per day to avoid shock.
 
Old 06-02-2018, 02:19 PM
 
Location: My House
34,938 posts, read 36,270,562 times
Reputation: 26552
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwynedd1 View Post
Here is a test for derangement syndrome:


List all the good things about Obama:



If the list is zero then you have Obama derangement syndrome.

List the good things about Trump:

If the list is zero its a sign of Trump derangement syndrome.


Here is my list of Obama:

* ended the Cuba embargo.
* did not suck up to Israel to the extend of others, including Trump.
* did not over react against fracking.(there are environmental issues, yes)
* was not a Russia hawk, unlike Romney.
* reversed torture polices


And I really did not like a lot of Obama's polices because he is too much of the central micro manager, which generally means they micromanage things best left to the states or the market.
That's not a test. I could list some good things about Adolph Hitler. Anyone could.

I could list something good about Trump, probably... I just don't spend much time thinking about him because I don't like him. I didn't spend much time thinking about Charles Manson, either. Didn't like him.

Am I deranged for not liking Charles Manson?
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:34 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top