Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-16-2009, 10:29 AM
 
Location: South Fla
9,644 posts, read 9,851,419 times
Reputation: 1942

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
Nope, just an observation. Do carry on with the "debate".
Still waiting on you to explain why its ok for the gov that is deeply in debt like never before. That is having to borrow money to pay bills now just printing money to pay bills Because china said no more loans., Can have a conference on tax payers dime

But a company that borrowed money from the gov is told by the gov they cant have a conference on taxpayers dime. Which borrowed less then the 1st one that borrowed.

How come one is ok but the other isnt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-16-2009, 10:32 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,880,765 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
Im sorry if you didnt understand the Bush reference, but Im kinda tickled that you think "delusianne" must be more than one person.obviously such a comment wouldnt change the course of the conversation.
You WERE deflecting it however hoping to go in another direction....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2009, 10:32 AM
 
Location: South Fla
9,644 posts, read 9,851,419 times
Reputation: 1942
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
For whatever reason, they said no teleconferencing would be allowed.

Anyway it'll be interesting to see if they put a moratorium on things like this in the coming months and years, penny-pinching though they may be. OR if they take my brilliant advice and do it all locally (except the airfare).
Yes like they are going to say that teleconference would have worked and then there would be no excuses to have a small vacation on taxpayers dime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2009, 10:32 AM
 
16,579 posts, read 20,720,243 times
Reputation: 26860
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jadex View Post
Still waiting on you to explain why its ok for the gov that is deeply in debt like never before. That is having to borrow money to pay bills now just printing money to pay bills Because china said no more loans., Can have a conference on tax payers dime

But a company that borrowed money from the gov is told by the gov they cant have a conference on taxpayers dime. Which borrowed less then the 1st one that borrowed.

How come one is ok but the other isnt.
It's not ok for the government to waste taxpayer money. Ever. But can you explain why (other than your own blind hatred) you think Obama is personally responsible for the cost of this conference? Do you think he made the plans? Looked at the budget? Signed the checks?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2009, 10:33 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,880,765 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
For whatever reason, they said no teleconferencing would be allowed.

Anyway it'll be interesting to see if they put a moratorium on things like this in the coming months and years, penny-pinching though they may be. OR if they take my brilliant advice and do it all locally (except the airfare).
Who cares what they said....Obama or his admin should have put a stop to it as it shows a double standard.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2009, 10:34 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,172,024 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jadex View Post
Still waiting on you to explain why its ok for the gov that is deeply in debt like never before. That is having to borrow money to pay bills now just printing money to pay bills Because china said no more loans., Can have a conference on tax payers dime

But a company that borrowed money from the gov is told by the gov they cant have a conference on taxpayers dime. Which borrowed less then the 1st one that borrowed.

How come one is ok but the other isnt.
sorry, didnt see the question.

of course, it's not right or good
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2009, 10:34 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,880,765 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlow View Post
It's not ok for the government to waste taxpayer money. Ever. But can you explain why (other than your own blind hatred) you think Obama is personally responsible for the cost of this conference? Do you think he made the plans? Looked at the budget? Signed the checks?
He knew about what private companies were planning to do after they accepted the people's money in a bailout....perhaps Obama and his admin should pay attention to what is happening in their OWN house????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2009, 10:37 AM
 
551 posts, read 856,211 times
Reputation: 139
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
I didnt pay attention to any of this stuff until around last spring. Thanks for asking though.

edit -- whoa -- I mean two springs ago!

So, it took you, one, um two springs ago to notice that the government wastes tax dollars??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2009, 10:37 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,172,024 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
Who cares what they said....Obama or his admin should have put a stop to it as it shows a double standard.
He and they rightly didnt step in and put a stop to the publicly traded civilian TARP companies' spending.

I have the feeling SSA's budget -- since they were allotted $400/night for hotels,(yet only spent $85/night) -- is still pretty large.

Social Security Budget-Budget Estimates and Related Information
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2009, 10:39 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,295,951 times
Reputation: 11416
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl
Not only have I served, but have worked in and for DOD for over 25 years.
Why do you ask?
I stand corrected. Unfortunate choice of words, DOD probably ultimately pays my salary.

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidmg1 View Post
When all of this took place under Bush like you say, did you defend it like your defending it now?
I don't recall it ever being an issue during the bush years.
Why would it have been then, and why is it now?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:40 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top