Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-16-2022, 10:13 PM
 
Location: Houston/Austin, TX
9,859 posts, read 6,570,632 times
Reputation: 6399

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonBornMassMade View Post
i dont know why they picked Gillette stadium...
Because Boston is one of the premier cities in USA and while Gillette is no Sofi or Allegiant, it's a decent stadium.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-16-2022, 10:24 PM
 
Location: Houston/Austin, TX
9,859 posts, read 6,570,632 times
Reputation: 6399
So there's one last factor that (I think) no one mentioned which is bribing and corruption. I'm sure there were some deciding factors involved there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2022, 11:05 PM
 
Location: BMORE!
10,106 posts, read 9,954,859 times
Reputation: 5779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
DC would have been chosen if they had a better stadium. But that stadium is a dump. I don't even think it should be worthy of renovation. It's a dump. Watched Arsenal-Real Madrid game there in 2019. It was clear that Washington needed a new stadium.
FedEx Field is slightly newer than M&T Bank Stadium, so how do it get so bad so fast?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2022, 11:23 PM
 
39 posts, read 37,076 times
Reputation: 38
Hopefully the Commanders new stadium is finished by 2029 then so Washington D.C can be a 2031 Rugby World Cup host city
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2022, 12:51 AM
 
Location: Odenton, MD
3,525 posts, read 2,316,290 times
Reputation: 3769
Quote:
Originally Posted by ParaguaneroSwag View Post
Because Boston is one of the premier cities in USA and while Gillette is no Sofi or Allegiant, it's a decent stadium.
Boston was primarily picked it because of Kraft's deep ties to FIFA, not because it's a great stadium and for sure not from a logistical standpoint as Gillette is almost the same distance from Boston as Baltimore's M&T Bank is from DC.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonBornMassMade View Post
i dont know why they picked Gillette stadium...
..... Kraft

Last edited by Joakim3; 06-17-2022 at 01:05 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2022, 04:02 AM
 
Location: Unplugged from the matrix
4,754 posts, read 2,972,766 times
Reputation: 5126
Quote:
Originally Posted by ParaguaneroSwag View Post
So there's one last factor that (I think) no one mentioned which is bribing and corruption. I'm sure there were some deciding factors involved there.
That was already mentioned pages ago. It's called "politics".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2022, 04:58 AM
 
Location: Germantown, Philadelphia
14,155 posts, read 9,047,788 times
Reputation: 10496
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpomp View Post
I think a covered stadium is a requirement in case of inclement weather. That is likely the only reason why it haven't been in Philadelphia.



And I think Comcasts influence over global media, air rights, soccer, etc., helped Philadelphia.
Arrowhead Stadium in Kansas City is totally roofless. (It's part of a two-stadium complex that opened in the early 1970s. A rolling arched metal roof that would cover an entire stadium was supposed to be part of the package, but that got deleted to save money.)

Edited to add: I'm not 100 percent sure of this, but at age 50, I think Arrowhead may well be the oldest of the stadiums picked for the FIFA World Cup, though I think Gilette Stadium in Foxboro, Mass., may be about as old.

Didn't someone point out upthread that no games are going to be played in actual MLS stadia in the cities that have MLS teams? (In the case of these two cities, the Philadelphia Union and Sporting KC.) They hold too few people.

I share your suspicion about Comcast and Philadelphia. Bet they make room in the NBC10 studios in the Comcast Technology Center for NBC Sports personnel (and those from other networks abroad).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2022, 05:44 AM
 
Location: sumter
12,966 posts, read 9,647,406 times
Reputation: 10432
Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonBornMassMade View Post
i dont know why they picked Gillette stadium...
Isn't it the largest stadium in that state and all New England.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2022, 06:03 AM
 
Location: Unplugged from the matrix
4,754 posts, read 2,972,766 times
Reputation: 5126
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarketStEl View Post
Arrowhead Stadium in Kansas City is totally roofless. (It's part of a two-stadium complex that opened in the early 1970s. A rolling arched metal roof that would cover an entire stadium was supposed to be part of the package, but that got deleted to save money.)

Edited to add: I'm not 100 percent sure of this, but at age 50, I think Arrowhead may well be the oldest of the stadiums picked for the FIFA World Cup, though I think Gilette Stadium in Foxboro, Mass., may be about as old.

Didn't someone point out upthread that no games are going to be played in actual MLS stadia in the cities that have MLS teams? (In the case of these two cities, the Philadelphia Union and Sporting KC.) They hold too few people.

I share your suspicion about Comcast and Philadelphia. Bet they make room in the NBC10 studios in the Comcast Technology Center for NBC Sports personnel (and those from other networks abroad).
So Philly could be a dark horse for the media center? With the 250th anniversary and Comcasr, I can see it. Would be a fun city for the media too IMO (better than ATL and DFW).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2022, 06:20 AM
 
Location: sumter
12,966 posts, read 9,647,406 times
Reputation: 10432
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarketStEl View Post
Arrowhead Stadium in Kansas City is totally roofless. (It's part of a two-stadium complex that opened in the early 1970s. A rolling arched metal roof that would cover an entire stadium was supposed to be part of the package, but that got deleted to save money.)

Edited to add: I'm not 100 percent sure of this, but at age 50, I think Arrowhead may well be the oldest of the stadiums picked for the FIFA World Cup, though I think Gilette Stadium in Foxboro, Mass., may be about as old.

Didn't someone point out upthread that no games are going to be played in actual MLS stadia in the cities that have MLS teams? (In the case of these two cities, the Philadelphia Union and Sporting KC.) They hold too few people.

I share your suspicion about Comcast and Philadelphia. Bet they make room in the NBC10 studios in the Comcast Technology Center for NBC Sports personnel (and those from other networks abroad).
No not even close, Arrowhead is nearly 30 years older than Gillette Stadium, Gillette opened in 2000, Arrowhead in 1972.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top