Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-09-2016, 09:08 AM
 
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,916,433 times
Reputation: 4561

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
I think it shows more about home the 50 state polls when pulled out of the larger national poll just shows some bizarre results. This poll also has Michigan real close, Ohio to the right of Mississippi, etc.

It is one thing to poll a state individually or even 50 separate state polls, but it appears this one along with the Ipsos one takes one huge national poll and breaks out each state from the larger national poll. If the poll is being weighted nationally and at the state level it might work, but that doesn't seem to be happening.
The MOE gets huge when States are broken out in a national poll, as there are not enough statistical valid participants. If the poll was done statistically correct state by state, and then combined for a national number, that would be different.

I bet both the GOP and DEMs are well aware of this, and base there actions on their internal state by state polling, not the stuff we plebes get to see.

 
Old 09-09-2016, 09:30 AM
 
17,273 posts, read 9,551,388 times
Reputation: 16468
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddiehaskell View Post
538 doesn't understand how the electoral college works?
Correct, you don't understand. Here's the 2012 presidential election electorate. Remember who won that year? See how this map is identical to the cute little one you posted? You seem to think seeing a lot of red means that a republican will win. I steer you towards the Wikipedia page regarding the electoral college. Wikipedia is easy reading, you should be able to understand it.
 
Old 09-09-2016, 09:35 AM
 
12,547 posts, read 9,927,676 times
Reputation: 6927
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefragile View Post
Correct, you don't understand. Here's the 2012 presidential election electorate. Remember who won that year? See how this map is identical to the cute little one you posted? You seem to think seeing a lot of red means that a republican will win. I steer you towards the Wikipedia page regarding the electoral college. Wikipedia is easy reading, you should be able to understand it.
538 takes into account state-by-state numbers when they make their percentage based predictions. So what point are you trying to make?

You have no argument here. Stop building a straw man and give it up.
 
Old 09-09-2016, 09:37 AM
 
17,273 posts, read 9,551,388 times
Reputation: 16468
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddiehaskell View Post
538 takes into account state-by-state numbers when they make their percentage based predictions. So what point are you trying to make?

You have no argument here. Stop building a straw man and give it up.
My point is very simple. Your map is identical to the 2012 presidential election outcome. Not sure why you're not understanding something so simple.
 
Old 09-09-2016, 09:41 AM
 
12,547 posts, read 9,927,676 times
Reputation: 6927
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefragile View Post
My point is very simple. Your map is identical to the 2012 presidential election outcome. Not sure why you're not understanding something so simple.
No it's not. 538's numbers on July 25th added up to a 56.5% chance of Trump obtaining 270 electoral votes and winning the election. Again, what are you trying to argue?
 
Old 09-09-2016, 09:45 AM
 
Location: Denver CO
24,204 posts, read 19,191,156 times
Reputation: 38266
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddiehaskell View Post
He actually peaked at 57.5% on July 25th:

Nate Silver: Trump Would Win If The Election Were Today

That's about 60% from where I'm standing.
It's irrelevant anyway - the election wasn't being held on July 25th, with the RNC convention bounce in full effect and prior to the Democrats nominating their own candidate.

As of this morning, 538 Now-cast numbers are 72.1% for Hillary and 27.9% for Donald.
 
Old 09-09-2016, 09:47 AM
 
12,547 posts, read 9,927,676 times
Reputation: 6927
Quote:
Originally Posted by emm74 View Post
It's irrelevant anyway - the election wasn't being held on July 25th, with the RNC convention bounce in full effect and prior to the Democrats nominating their own candidate.

As of this morning, 538 Now-cast numbers are 72.1% for Hillary and 27.9% for Donald.
That was never the argument.
 
Old 09-09-2016, 09:49 AM
 
12,547 posts, read 9,927,676 times
Reputation: 6927
UPI/CVoter

Trump 47.19%
Clinton 46.84%
 
Old 09-09-2016, 09:50 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,197,584 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddiehaskell View Post
No it's not. 538's numbers on July 25th added up to a 56.5% chance of Trump obtaining 270 electoral votes and winning the election. Again, what are you trying to argue?
Yes, IF you are looking at the vote today numbers, but remember this is right after the RNC convention and his numbers plummeted the next week.

If you look at the polls plus forecast his percentage was 40.5% (his highest) while Clintons was 59.5% (her lowest) for the same day.
 
Old 09-09-2016, 09:58 AM
 
12,547 posts, read 9,927,676 times
Reputation: 6927
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
Yes, IF you are looking at the vote today numbers, but remember this is right after the RNC convention and his numbers plummeted the next week.

If you look at the polls plus forecast his percentage was 40.5% (his highest) while Clintons was 59.5% (her lowest) for the same day.
And that's exactly what we were looking at.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top