Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-04-2016, 04:35 PM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,720,265 times
Reputation: 12943

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
So you are saying the states that pay the most in taxes should decide who is president?

So in other words, you think the blue states should be able to buy the election.

Your true colors are showing, and it isn't very becoming.
I'm saying the states that have the most people also pay the most and are least represented, resulting in the tyranny of the minority. There are ways around this and we will likely see them over time since Democrats have won six out of the last seven popular votes. Democrats in blue locations earn the most, pay the most and are represented the least. Name the Republican locations Trump has hotels.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-04-2016, 04:36 PM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,643,000 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
I'm saying the states that have the most people also pay the most and are least represented, resulting in the tyranny of the minority. There are ways around this and we will likely see them over time since Democrats have won six out of the last seven popular votes. Democrats in blue locations earn the most, pay the most and are represented the least. Name the Republican locations Trump has hotels.
None of this is true. Just like when you told us your relative was going to move to Canada if Trump won.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2016, 04:38 PM
 
Location: N Atlanta
4,584 posts, read 4,199,647 times
Reputation: 2323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
I'm saying the states that have the most people also pay the most and are least represented, resulting in the tyranny of the minority. There are ways around this and we will likely see them over time since Democrats have won six out of the last seven popular votes. Democrats in blue locations earn the most, pay the most and are represented the least. Name the Republican locations Trump has hotels.
Really ? Please enlighten us or does only the Illuminati know ?

Trump has hotels in Florida ... did Clinton win the state ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2016, 04:42 PM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,643,000 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
It's no wonder that flyover states love the electoral college. It overrepresents them electorally while they pay the least federally.
You also seemed to love the Electoral College when we were talking about Obama.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
You mean the two elections where President Obama won by 8:00 p.m. (365 electoral votes) and 8:15 p.m. (332 electoral votes) respectively? You mean those two elections where it wasn't even close?
This speaks for itself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2016, 04:49 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,068,169 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
Democrats in blue locations earn the most, pay the most and are represented the least.
You can repeat this all you want but it will not make it true. Your reluctance to address what I have posted about why it's false speaks volumes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2016, 04:51 PM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,720,265 times
Reputation: 12943
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
You can repeat this all you want but it will not make it true. Your reluctance to address what I have posted about why it's false speaks volumes.
The OP includes the sourcing from the NY Times but Trump supporters tend to not read those sources.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2016, 04:57 PM
 
17,344 posts, read 11,289,865 times
Reputation: 40990
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Trumps policies will reduce the illegal population, the illegal population is included in the census count and that will occur 2020. One estimate suggests California could lose up to 5 House seats, Texas 2, Washington 1 and New York 2. Those seats will be reallocated to red/purplish states, all ten went for Trump this election.

In case you are unaware they will also lose an equal amount of electoral college votes and federal funding when population is considered. Enjoy!
It's no wonder CA has become a sanctuary State. They have much to lose when the illegals leave.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2016, 05:24 PM
 
908 posts, read 1,419,366 times
Reputation: 764
7 of the 10 most populous states went to Trump. The 12 states/DC that have 3 or 4 electoral votes were split between the two candidates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2016, 05:26 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,068,169 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
The OP includes the sourcing from the NY Times but Trump supporters tend to not read those sources.
The fact that some state receive more per capita dollars is not what is in question. It's how that single number is being used to represent what is a very complex calculation that is the issue.

As I have already noted Sandia National lab in NM adds $1200 in per capita spending for that state, undoubtedly NM enjoys some economic benefit of that funding but primary beneficiary is the entire country.

I-80 connects San Francisco with NYC and also goes through many low population states, the coast to coast commerce is the primary beneficiary.

To complicate things even further the direct and indirect tax revenue generated by operation like oil drilling in ND may not be attributed to ND.

Trying to use a single raw data point is just stupidity.

Last edited by thecoalman; 12-04-2016 at 05:52 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2016, 05:33 PM
 
Location: Billings, MT
9,884 posts, read 10,980,100 times
Reputation: 14180
Yes, it is truly disgusting how much power Montana has.
We are a big state with a small population, yet we have 2 Senators (just like every other state). The Party "gerrymandered" the state so that our House member has to represent the entire state. We get a whopping huge THREE electoral votes!
Wyoming is in the same boat, nearly identical, in fact.
Oh, boo hoo, you lost. Deal With it or leave the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top