Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Naydia, those fingernails of yours - they are the first thing seen when the camera flashes on you with a baby. Narcissistic, entitled, selfinvolved are only a few of the adjectives I think of when I see your face. Who payed for the manicure? Brenda in Thousand Oaks.
[quote=Brenda Feldman;7423994]Naydia, those fingernails of yours - they are the first thing seen when the camera flashes on you with a baby. Narcissistic, entitled, selfinvolved are only a few of the adjectives I think of when I see your face. Naydia - I don't think you are reachable - you are so caught up in the web that you have spun - you can't see the individual baby for those eggs you so prized.
Every time this woman (and I use the term loosely) opens her mouth, she digs herself in deeper.
She should shut up before somebody shoots her, and figure out what she's doing with all those kids, and how she's going to take care of them.
I think at this point, any corporate sponsor will take a real beating if they step in, and rightly so.
The state of California is near bankruptcy, and now they're looking at a bill for millions just to get these babies out of the hospital, let alone the millions they face to pay for the rest of those kid's lives in health care, food stamps, payments for more disabilities, and general welfare.
I guess they don't care. Everyday I hoe to hear that Protective Services has looked into the MOm , yet I haven't.
I don't think there's anything they CAN do yet. Eventually...someone will hopefully find something and file a complaint and they will.
There's nothing they could do unless they can prove that she is not feeding them (regardless of where she's getting the money to feed them), that they do not have shelter (regardless of who's providing it or how many are in a room), that they do not have medical care, or that they are being abused in some way.
The only other way anything could be done with regards to her having custody is if she was put in prison for disability fraud or if she was committed to a psych hospital.
I watched an episode of Dr. Phil this morning and he was talking about this woman who had Octuplets with 6 already at home..YIKES..14 children. There is no "Father" she had invitro and asked the Doctor who did the invitro to implant at least 6 eggs so that she could be assured they would "take". It surely isn't fair to all these kids for her to have all these children and be on assistance. According to the program this morning, in her first set of children, she has I believe 2 who have special needs. Dr. Phil made a valid point when he said that over the years, he has counseled folks who want plastic surgery prior to the surgery and someone should have caught this woman before she went unmarried and had a second invitro done. However.......what he did NOT mention was the fact that there is a family out there the DRUGGERS who have 18 children and I don't think there are any multiples amongst them..they just keep popping them out one after another.
The Duggers are a totally different situation. They may have a ton of kids (I think there is one set of twins amongst them), but they are taking care of them on their own.
Naydia, those fingernails of yours - they are the first thing seen when the camera flashes on you with a baby. Narcissistic, entitled, selfinvolved are only a few of the adjectives I think of when I see your face. Who payed for the manicure? Brenda in Thousand Oaks.
Haa haa and I thought I was the only one who noticed the nails.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.