Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-24-2011, 05:57 PM
 
Location: In the Redwoods
30,360 posts, read 51,970,126 times
Reputation: 23808

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
again, there is NO specific code for a non smoking room. second, you do not reserve a non smoking room, you REQUEST one.
Exactly... it even says on most online hotel reservation systems, "Special requests are not guaranteed." I can read, imagine that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-24-2011, 05:58 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,823,758 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by gizmo980 View Post
He already said (more or less) "except in cases like hospitals, police stations, etc, where people have no choice but to be inside & exposed to the smoke." So I imagine airplanes fall under than category, given that you can't open a window or request a "non-smoking room" on a plane.
You should have waited until he answered himself:

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasReb View Post
I would say that is up to the actual airline carrier as to how they regulate it or not. This is also one of those areas where people have freedom of choice. But I can see this one has a lot of variable about it. Good question.
Freedom of choice, my foot. Especially flying to some smaller airports, there's no choice at all. Of course, people should be exposed to cigarette smoke, say, all the way from Cali to NY. It's only a carcinogen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2011, 06:01 PM
 
Location: In the Redwoods
30,360 posts, read 51,970,126 times
Reputation: 23808
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
You should have waited until he answered himself:
Perhaps, but my point still stands... even if he disagrees.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2011, 06:02 PM
 
10,239 posts, read 19,616,607 times
Reputation: 5943
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
If a hotel allows smoking and overbooks in the non-smoking rooms, they should pay punitive damages to the customer who ends up in a smoking room.
I have never heard of a person asking for a non-smoking room being given a smoking room instead without the person being informed beforehand there were none of the former available. As it is today, the liklihood of non-smoking rooms vis a vis smoking room available are almost non-existant.

Can you furnish anything from personal experience on this? As it is, I was on a business trip some years back and I had no problem with a non-smoking room since I had quit smoking, however my travelling companion had asked for a smoking room. They had none available, but gave the guy a free room for the trouble. So, really, it worked out that the smoker got the better end of the deal! LOL

But why should "punative damages" be paid anyway even if a non-smoker, on the most unlikely instance s/he would have to stay in a smoking room? A free room oughta be enough, I would think. But again, that is a most unlikely scenario.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2011, 06:03 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,835,417 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by gizmo980 View Post
Airplanes overbook all the time, and only offer "punitive damages" (usually a travel certificate) to select people... everyone else is SOL for not checking in early enough to secure a seat, and waits for the next flight.

Should they also offer punitive damages to a smoker who requests a smoking room and doesn't get one? That's happened to me MANY times, and I just took the room and dealt with it. People are so whiny and demanding these days, I swear!
Any hotel that requires a deposit of the first night, has a contract to provide that requested room. Either the hotel fulfills this contract or pays punitive charges.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2011, 06:09 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
2,239 posts, read 3,231,463 times
Reputation: 1180
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
if no non smoking rooms are available, but there are rooms available, then you will only deny yourself a room.



the problem is that you requested a non smoking room. unless the hotel had a specific code for non smoking rooms, and none that i have worked at in 25 years did, they can only give you what they have. for instance if the property in question had 75 non smoking rooms available, and 80 reservations had a non smoking room request, unless you got there before all the non smoking rooms were sold, you are SOL, unless you want to go to another hotel. it happens, get over it.
No...you smokers who don't want to respect other people's health need to get over it.
Get used to it. Bars, restaurants, clubs, hotels, cruises, even PARKS are banning smoking. So make sure you puff, puff, puff before arriving.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2011, 06:09 PM
 
442 posts, read 540,397 times
Reputation: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by crbcrbrgv View Post
Sorry, but nobody gives a damn about smokers anymore. You pollute the environment and raise healthcare costs for all.

You have gone the way of the horse and buggy. Get over yourself. It's not a liberal or conservative issue. It's a "the country has evolved and you refuse to" issue.
This.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2011, 06:16 PM
 
Location: Santa Ana, CA
298 posts, read 389,972 times
Reputation: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
Freedom of choice, my foot. Especially flying to some smaller airports, there's no choice at all. Of course, people should be exposed to cigarette smoke, say, all the way from Cali to NY. It's only a carcinogen.
Huh? Neither Cali nor New York are small airports. Cali is the 3rd largest city in Colombia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2011, 06:21 PM
 
10,239 posts, read 19,616,607 times
Reputation: 5943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
You should have waited until he answered himself:
As it is, his position is pretty much the same as mine.

Quote:
Freedom of choice, my foot. Especially flying to some smaller airports, there's no choice at all. Of course, people should be exposed to cigarette smoke, say, all the way from Cali to NY. It's only a carcinogen.
LOL Another of your condecending attempts at irony, huh, Katiana? Oh my gosh, none of the rest of us know it is only a carcinogen...

Uhhh, how is there no choice? You can drive, take a train, a bus, or find another airline service.

But the really relevent point is this one: Can you name just one airline carrier that permits smoking anymore, without looking it up on Google? In fact, by all means look it up on Google and see how many carriers allow smoking these days. If they exist, please tell me what they are.

If you can't, then what is your point?

Last edited by TexasReb; 12-24-2011 at 06:58 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2011, 06:35 PM
 
10,239 posts, read 19,616,607 times
Reputation: 5943
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYer75 View Post
No...you smokers who don't want to respect other people's health need to get over it.
Get used to it. Bars, restaurants, clubs, hotels, cruises, even PARKS are banning smoking. So make sure you puff, puff, puff before arriving.
It would be better if those who respect their own health do so by not going into places where smoking is allowed. Of course, I realize this demands that people be responsible for their own choices and behavior...which is becoming an increasingly foriegn concept these days.

Besides, be honest, NYer. It is really all about incremental control and restricting private property rights for you, anyway, isn't it? The anti-smoking crusade is just a stalking horse for your larger ideology. Now ain't that right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:09 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top