Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-10-2012, 11:54 AM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,787,000 times
Reputation: 4174

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
No, the people that sign the other side of union contracts should mhave enough management skill to NOT sign contracts they KNOW can't be sustained. It takes at least TWO parties to make a contract, they ALL share in the consequences.
What baloney.

The people who signed the other side of the union contracts, then left office with fat pensions of their own, and aren't sharing in the consequences at all.

I have to assume you were joking here. You were, weren't you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-10-2012, 11:55 AM
 
5,524 posts, read 9,940,895 times
Reputation: 1867
Who are the previous politicians that put this in place and where are they now?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2012, 11:56 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,411,082 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
dont forget the children when you bring up "consequences"
This isn't just about teachers' unions, the right cheers when CEOs and their ilk grab as much $$$ as they can, often while their companies performance don't justify it yet vilify unions for doing the same.

As I've said, it takes at keast TWO parfties to make a contract, blaming only one when things go awry is hypocritical BS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2012, 12:01 PM
 
45,232 posts, read 26,457,645 times
Reputation: 24994
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
This isn't just about teachers' unions, the right cheers when CEOs and their ilk grab as much $$$ as they can, often while their companies performance don't justify it yet vilify unions for doing the same.

As I've said, it takes at keast TWO parfties to make a contract, blaming only one when things go awry is hypocritical BS.
apples to bowling balls.
taxpayers are forced at gunpoint to pay teacher salaries, CEO's like athletes, are paid by the dollars of a willing consumer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2012, 12:01 PM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,717,580 times
Reputation: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toroid View Post
Lol. He actually just copied them all from Drudge, shock headlines and all.


DRUDGE REPORT 2012®

Yes, they are ALL from Drudge.

I asked the person whom I quoted if they'll read them since they were complaining that people don't read the links.

Seems pretty valid of a statement considering they were complaining about people reading links.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2012, 12:03 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
It's not like Chicago hasn't tried to cover paying for the school system. The city is wallowing in a $700 million deficit.
What do you do when you have no money and you have reached the cap on your taxes ?
You're $700 million in debt and your teachers want a double digit increase, small classes and more classes offered ?

CPS to raise property taxes to the legal maximum - Chicago Sun-Times
For the second year in a row, Chicago Public School officials under Mayor Rahm Emanuel will raise property taxes for schools to the maximum allowed by law, yielding the cash-strapped system $41 million.
..
The $41 million in new revenue will help CPS plug an estimated deficit of up to $700 million — including $114 million in lost federal and state funds — just as it battles with teachers to replace a union contract that expires June 30.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2012, 12:03 PM
 
Location: Alaska
7,507 posts, read 5,755,367 times
Reputation: 4892
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
Fire them all.

Hire some illegals to do the job American teachers won't do.
Break the union then fire them all
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2012, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Maryland
18,630 posts, read 19,424,868 times
Reputation: 6462
Chicago is approaching failed city status.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2012, 12:06 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,059 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
taxpayers are forced at gunpoint to pay teacher salaries, CEO's like athletes, are paid by the dollars of a willing consumer.
Exactly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2012, 12:07 PM
 
25,849 posts, read 16,537,070 times
Reputation: 16028
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
I'll happily support your right to strike. I'll also support your employer's right to hire people to replace those on strike.

Especially in a case where it's taxpayer funded employees on strike. For far too many years pols have given the PE unions everything they could ask for, in return for campaign contributions and votes. For once, it's time that someone stood up for the taxpayer. I don't have a problem with teachers making decent wages, their job isn't easy. I think their wages and benefits should bear some relationship to those of the people paying their salaries.
I'm against corruption of ALL kinds but I will not let it affect my support for unions and workers rights.

I'm glad I don't live in some right to work state. Here in Minnesota union people have rights, as do employers. Arbitrators are neutral and non-political and we have gotten our butts kicked by them many times.

But they cannot just replace us because we strike. That is as un-American as it gets IMO.

Taking away union rights is just as bad or worse than taking away firearms.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top