Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-02-2015, 05:20 AM
 
1,589 posts, read 1,183,995 times
Reputation: 1097

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
Wow, subsidize them or they'll kick your ass and take your things. It never occurred to people like this to "actually earn what they need". Sounds a little like blackmail. And then you wonder why people arm themselves. How about getting a second job like many of us did when we needed more money.
Nature is not kind. The natural world that right-wingers long for is an ugly and brutish world where the strong simply take things from the weak. The idea that guns will somehow even things out is itself evidence of what poor thinking has gone into all this "nature" nonsense to begin with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-02-2015, 05:20 AM
 
Location: Upstate NY 🇺🇸
36,754 posts, read 14,816,833 times
Reputation: 35584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curious Discussion View Post
When people argue about low wages and a $15 minimum wage, the typical response is the low wage employee should just go back to school and learn a trade so they can earn more. Great idea but the low wage menial job still needs to be done by someone, so the newly trained worker will just be replaced by someone else.

Maybe 30% of full time jobs pay less than $15 an hour. Someone has got to do the low pay work, SO: Should the government pay welfare to the people who support a family on low income?


As has already been noted, workers already get welfare. Income and HH size are what's considered, not employment status.

Even low wage workers can be poor at budgeting money. Perhaps DHS should emphasize that, and offer such assistance to those receiving benefits
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2015, 05:22 AM
 
1,589 posts, read 1,183,995 times
Reputation: 1097
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
So the left is ruled by fear?
By fact and reason. Things that the right-wing is not much familiar with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2015, 05:26 AM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,687 posts, read 21,035,253 times
Reputation: 14235
Originally Posted by petch751
Wow, subsidize them or they'll kick your ass and take your things. It never occurred to people like this to "actually earn what they need". Sounds a little like blackmail. And then you wonder why people arm themselves. How about getting a second job like many of us did when we needed more money.

what is wrong with this picture-
1- not you-- 60 yrs ago
2 maybe have children to care for
3 most jobs are all part time- so you still be gone many hours only making the minimum to survive, with 2/3 PT jobs
you assume jobs just so available to all - I drive in Polk county- where sex-trafficking in rampant- the teens have no jobs no transportation and it is sparsely populated. Easy victims for girls who want just a nice dress...
its so easy to say--when you do NOT live their circumstances.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2015, 05:28 AM
 
1,589 posts, read 1,183,995 times
Reputation: 1097
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
So to restate this, is it your contention the role of society is to transfer wealth from those who created it, to those who don't?
That's correct, though better stated as moving wealth from the more fortunate to the less fortunate. That way we can just skip past any irrational notions of who is out there "creating" wealth. LOL! In any case and as noted earlier, risk-sharing and wealth redistribution are core purposes within any society.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2015, 05:34 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,979 posts, read 44,788,307 times
Reputation: 13684
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinytrump View Post
The Cato Institute estimates that federal subsidies to corporations cost taxpayers almost $100 billion every year

Ten Examples of Welfare for the Rich and Corporations*|*Bill Quigley

are you going to DENY the facts?? really??I can post and post and post all the actual funding going to corps
The FACT is that John and Jane Worker and Jack and Jill Retiree in aggregate have more wealth invested in corporations than do the rich by a margin of more than 2 to 1. Attack corporations, and you attack Main Street America's retirement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2015, 05:36 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,979 posts, read 44,788,307 times
Reputation: 13684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reynard32 View Post
The question here is over alleged effectiveness. Why do you simply run away from the entire point of such questions so quickly and consistently? Hmmm...?
The issue is RESPONSIBILITY. How could you have possibly missed that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2015, 05:38 AM
 
1,589 posts, read 1,183,995 times
Reputation: 1097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Welfare should only be paid after the claimant proves they have done everything possible to maximize their disposable income.
Wouldn't all this proving result in further diminished disposable income? Sounds a little bit counter-productive. The traditional means of establishing eligibility seem a lot more efficient to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2015, 05:39 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,979 posts, read 44,788,307 times
Reputation: 13684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reynard32 View Post
They do, and it doesn't work.
BS. For example, a household income of $36,000 (3 roommates each earning $12,000) is definitely doable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2015, 05:56 AM
 
1,589 posts, read 1,183,995 times
Reputation: 1097
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
The issue is RESPONSIBILITY. How could you have possibly missed that?
Responsibility is a pointless right-wing buzzword. While it may be very nice, it guarantees exactly NOTHING. You have all your eggs in one basket that has all sort of holes in the bottom. You then have no plan or advice at all to offer in the certain event that your swiss cheese notions fail to save the day.

Last edited by Reynard32; 11-02-2015 at 06:04 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top