Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: Just transplanted to FL from the N GA mountains
3,997 posts, read 4,140,997 times
Reputation: 2677
Advertisements
My question in all this....... The IG confirmed that the FBI/CIA knew that the "crime" that Mueller was investigating was bogus prior to Mueller's appointment as Special Counsel. The mother of all cover-ups? You can say Trump is dirty but this whole thing from the left screams dirt as well and the honest democrats would do well to look in the mirror and realize that as a whole the American people as just plain sick of all of them.....
If that were the case, Carter Page would be guilty of something.
But their actions show they did have a lot of bias. Especially the lovers texts.......
Anyone who would still defend the FISA warrants of Carter Page after the Horowitz report is deceiving themselves or you. There’s no defending it. Nunes was right about that. Schiff was wrong.
You have no idea what your talking about, there were FISA warrants on Page back in 2014 that led to the conviction of Russian spies, they are used to gather information not to necessarily because the source is a criminal. Just because they have a warrant doesn't mean they are guilty, just that they have contacts.
Nunes wouldn't know the truth if it hit him in the head.
You have no idea what your talking about, there were FISA warrants on Page back in 2014 that led to the conviction of Russian spies, they are used to gather information not to necessarily because the source is a criminal. Just because they have a warrant doesn't mean they are guilty, just that they have contacts.
Nunes wouldn't know the truth if it hit him in the head.
Wrong.
Page was a US asset, that they failed to tell the FISA judge. He did not have a FISA on him in 2014.
The decision to open the Crossfire Hurricane investigation was made by the
FBI's then Counterintelligence Division (CD) Assistant Director (AD), E.W. "Bill"
Priestap, and reflected a consensus reached after multiple days of discussions and
meetings among senior FBI officials. We concluded that AD Priestap's exercise of
discretion in opening the investigation was in compliance with Department and FBI
policies, and we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias
or improper motivation influenced his decision.
Durham has WAY MORE power than Horowitz. Durham disagrees with Horowitz incomplete report.
Horowitz could only look at what the DOJ did. He could not even look at the collusion between Brennan and Clapper.
In steps Durham, to say... Horowitz report is incomplete.
Why bother, the conservatives believe the FBI acted like biased idiots. Let's not the fact that they were proven wrong and Trump lied not get in the way of them being rock-brained and not wanting admit they got it wrong and that there was little bias in the FBI investigation like the IRS investigation into 501(C)s which was proven more liberal groups with the name progressive and occupy in the name targeted than conservative ones. The conservative groups were just the loudest.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Any word on when the indictments begin? Durham? Durham? Durhan?
