Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Notice that he did not say Russia. The origins of this whole mess were with the Steele Dossier, paid for by the DNC and Hillary Clinton Campaign. His tweet is meaningless as far as your reply is concerned. Nice try.
The fact that the president is an asset has to do with him holding office while bowing to Putin, in general. My reply is meaningful given that Wray reintegrates that Trump is a liar. Trump tries to peddle conspiracies that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election to provide cover for Putin. Try again.
The fact that the president is an asset has to do with him holding office while bowing to Putin, in general. My reply is meaningful given that Wray reintegrates that Trump is a liar. Trump tries to peddle conspiracies that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election to provide cover for Putin. Try again.
Still has nothing to do with the fact that the NYT obfuscated the fact that the IG report has nothing to do with the origins of the accusations. This is the purpose of the post you replied to. I was pointing out that the link you provided went to a flawed article in the NYT.
Still has nothing to do with the fact that the NYT obfuscated the fact that the IG report has nothing to do with the origins of the accusations. This is the purpose of the post you replied to. I was pointing out that the link you provided went to a flawed article in the NYT.
I can keep trying all day.
Wrong. Again Trump lied no matter how many times you tried to defend it.
We concluded that the quantum of information articulated by the FBI to open the individual investigations on [George] Papadopoulos, [Carter] Page, [Michael] Flynn, and [Paul] Manafort in August 2016 was sufficient to satisfy the low threshold established by the Department and the FBI,”
“We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the decisions to open the four individual investigations,
we found no evidence that the FBI attempted to place any CHSs within the Trump campaign, recruit members of the Trump campaign as CHSs, or task CHSs to report on the Trump campaign.”
“These officials, though, did not become aware of Steele’s election reporting until weeks later, and we therefore determined that Steele’s reports played no role in the Crossfire Hurricane opening,”
So what was this " crucial " factor that was " key" to opening the investigation .
The report says what was not " crucial " in opening the investigation .
And it alludes to there being a "crucial" fact to opening the investigation , but as far as I have read I cannot readily identify this most " crucial " fact that prompted the investigation ?
Anyone ?
Just askin ?
Anybody?
Bueller ?
Wrong. Again Trump lied no matter how many times you tried to defend it.
We concluded that the quantum of information articulated by the FBI to open the individual investigations on [George] Papadopoulos, [Carter] Page, [Michael] Flynn, and [Paul] Manafort in August 2016 was sufficient to satisfy the low threshold established by the Department and the FBI,”
“We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the decisions to open the four individual investigations,
we found no evidence that the FBI attempted to place any CHSs within the Trump campaign, recruit members of the Trump campaign as CHSs, or task CHSs to report on the Trump campaign.”
“These officials, though, did not become aware of Steele’s election reporting until weeks later, and we therefore determined that Steele’s reports played no role in the Crossfire Hurricane opening,”
Where was all this in the NYT article? Seems that you must work for the NYT, because you obfuscate as good as they do. Either that or you just don't realize you are off on a tangent.
Where was all this in the NYT article? Seems that you must work for the NYT, because you obfuscate as good as they do. Either that or you just don't realize you are off on a tangent.
It's in the IG report which is referenced. Try reading it.
There must be multiple reports out then. One for you and a different one for me.
No. You are being fed misinformation about the report from whatever sources you go to. In other words, your sources are lying to you.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
