Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-28-2020, 08:11 AM
 
8,957 posts, read 2,561,248 times
Reputation: 4725

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Can trump rewrite laws made by congress?
Well, Obama rewrote immigration law, so there's precedent for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-28-2020, 08:11 AM
 
18,469 posts, read 8,292,857 times
Reputation: 13791
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeaMaj7 View Post
Publisher, or platform?

Checkmate, Jack. Ha ha.
So far these companies have claimed exemption to FCC regulations....claiming they didn't control the content

Since they are, in fact, extensively controlling content they don't agree with....

All Trump has to do is enforce the existing FCC laws and regulations....that doesn't involve anything new

...if they take it to court....they will loose

They got too big for their britches...and did it to themselves
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2020, 08:12 AM
 
7,447 posts, read 2,836,240 times
Reputation: 4922
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat View Post
Absolutely, and they'd have to ban more than half their users.

Meanwhile, Trump would merely head to a competitor and everyone would follow. It would be the end of Twitter.
I don't think you guys have thought this through(no surprise there). IF Trump were to do something along these lines, it would have a dramatic and negative impact on basically the entire gamut of user generated content on the internet.

Do you guys not understand what happens when you fxxk with the entire internet? Popularity, which is pretty vital for a politician, is not the result.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2020, 08:14 AM
 
8,957 posts, read 2,561,248 times
Reputation: 4725
Quote:
Originally Posted by zzzSnorlax View Post
I don't think you guys have thought this through(no surprise there). IF Trump were to do something along these lines, it would have a dramatic and negative impact on basically the entire gamut of user generated content on the internet.

Do you guys not understand what happens when you fxxk with the entire internet? Popularity, which is pretty vital for a politician, is not the result.
It would have a positive effect, it would require platforms to act as platforms rather than publishers. It would lead to less censorship and more free speech. Those who wished to act as publishers would die and be quickly replaced by better options.


So, really it would just be bad for abusive companies that wanted to push ideology and interfere in elections and other aspects of life. It would be good for everyone else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2020, 08:14 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,835,417 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat View Post
Well, Obama rewrote immigration law, so there's precedent for it.

I don't think so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2020, 08:15 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,668,310 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeutralParty View Post
That is another way of saying "go pound sand little man".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2020, 08:15 AM
 
8,957 posts, read 2,561,248 times
Reputation: 4725
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
I don't think so.
You thinking so or not thinking so changes nothing factually.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2020, 08:17 AM
 
7,447 posts, read 2,836,240 times
Reputation: 4922
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat View Post
It would have a positive effect, it would require platforms to act as platforms rather than publishers. It would lead to less censorship and more free speech. Those who wished to act as publishers would die and be quickly replaced by better options.


So, really it would just be bad for abusive companies that wanted to push ideology and interfere in elections and other aspects of life. It would be good for everyone else.
Lol no. The change in question would make websites legally liable for content published by their users. It will absolutely decimate content on the internet and either destroy user published content altogether or drasticly increase censorship of content as company's desperately try to decrease their legal exposure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2020, 08:18 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,835,417 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat View Post
It would have a positive effect, it would require platforms to act as platforms rather than publishers. It would lead to less censorship and more free speech. Those who wished to act as publishers would die and be quickly replaced by better options.


So, really it would just be bad for abusive companies that wanted to push ideology and interfere in elections and other aspects of life. It would be good for everyone else.
It would totally destroy this forum!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2020, 08:18 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,668,310 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat View Post
I think you fundamentally misunderstand what he's likely to do. The only thing Trump would have to do to completely destroy Twitter is to have their Section 130 protections taken away since they are operating as a publisher rather than a platform. Doing so would in no way restrict anyone's free speech, it would merely be applying the law accurately to Twitter. If they want Section 130 protections, they can make the relevant changes and dedicate themselves to being a platform rather than a publisher.....and they'd have to stop editorializing and censoring people in order to do that.

Free speech wins if Trump slaps around Twitter.
No more mods.......

I suppose same would apply to all social media, including discussion boards like CD. That would turn them into cesspools of porn, foul language and personal attacks.

Sounds like a pretty bad idea, and as such, a typical one from Trump.

How about giving private companies the freedom to decide how they want to moderate their boards? Just an idea....

All this just because Trump hurt his delicate feelings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:22 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top