Mississippi asks Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade; says 1973 decision was "egregiously wrong" (illegal, statistics)

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by RowingFiend

I’m sure all the liberals can cough up the money in a gofundme account to make it happen. God forbid a kid gets born instead of ripped apart in the womb.

Exactly.

[newtovenice]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

Totally off-topic hysteric hyperbole. No one is suing at SCOTUS to roll back voting rights for Blacks.

Let me remind everyone again that if states can restrict specifically enumerated Constitutional gun rights, and they do (even red states do), they can also restrict any perceived right to abortion. Can't have it both ways. Either states can restrict rights, or they can't.

I worked with a woman who was of this mindset. She was terrified, offended, and angry all the time. Was quite shocking once I understood her mindset.

Horrible way to live, in a complete non reality based life. Miserable all the time. Stuck in her social feedback loop that she THOUGHT was real. Just really, really sad.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by Oldglory

I had to laugh at the "war on women" remark. So ridiculous and such a desperate attempt to defend the indefensible.

Exactly. "War on women," they scream, as they gleefully advocate killing at least 350,000 of them each year. Idiots.

[ATX Wahine]

Originally Posted by AfriqueNY

It's like the frog in the pot of water. The right wing is just getting started. We will be Gilead in no time. They won't make the same mistakes in 2020. You can be sure that there will a roll back of voting rights for blacks. I can see Jim crow as well and Equal Opp Employment will be long gone history. Somewhere David Duke is smiling.

This is expert-level hysteria right here. It has no place anywhere … not even in your own head. It’s silly, exaggerative, and pure fantasy.

Gilead doesn’t exist. Women are not handmaidens. Jim Crow is not hiding in bushes, waiting to strike.

Grow up. Be practical. Be realistic. Stop saying ridiculous things like this.

[Goodnight]

[quote=newtovenice;62469718]There are late-term abortions that are elective.

The numbers are murky because data collection for late-term abortions is really poor.

There are 3 categories for late-term abortion: mother's health at risk, baby has untreatable medical condition, and elective.

So, yes, there are elective abortions done at late-term, mother is healthy and baby is healthy (until the abortion, of course). To pretend otherwise is dishonest.[/QUOTE]

That is a microscopic percentage unless you can back that up, there are statistics on 2nd and 3rd trimester abortions, the data is not murky. Besides that is not the reason for the Mississippi challenge, they want to move from 1st trimester to 15 weeks and other states are even more restrictive.

[newtovenice]

[quote=Goodnight;62469881]

Originally Posted by newtovenice

There are late-term abortions that are elective.

The numbers are murky because data collection for late-term abortions is really poor.

There are 3 categories for late-term abortion: mother's health at risk, baby has untreatable medical condition, and elective.

So, yes, there are elective abortions done at late-term, mother is healthy and baby is healthy (until the abortion, of course). To pretend otherwise is dishonest.[/QUOTE]

That is a microscopic percentage unless you can back that up, there are statistics on 2nd and 3rd trimester abortions, the data is not murky. Besides that is not the reason for the Mississippi challenge, they want to move from 1st trimester to 15 weeks and other states are even more restrictive.

I've seen statistics that vary tremendously regarding elective abortions at late term. States report and record data differently, and may have different definitions of what late-term abortion is.

Ranges for elective late-term abortions are from 30% to 80% of all late-term abortions. Which is why I did not include a percent initially because stating a percent with 100% confidence cannot be done because the data isn't there.

Instead I stated that YES there ARE ELECTIVE LATE-TERM ABORTIONS. [Caps for those in the back row.]


But yes, ELECTIVE later-term abortions are performed where perfectly healthy mothers have perfectly healthy babies killed.

That is a fact.

[Oldglory]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

Exactly. "War on women," they scream, as they gleefully advocate killing at least 350,000 of them each year. Idiots.

It's a war on babies not a war on women.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by Oldglory

It's a war on babies not a war on women.

Female babies become... women. The pro-abortion contingent quite gleefully advocates killing at least 350,000 of them each year.

[newtovenice]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

Female babies become... women. The pro-abortion contingent quite gleefully advocates killing at least 350,000 of them each year.

Don't forget the most dangerous place for a black baby is in his or her mother's womb.

Although blacks make up abut 13% of thee population, they account for >35% of all abortions. 1 out of 3 black babies are aborted.

But not a peep from BLM. Killing black babies is perfectly acceptable.

[Blondy]

[quote=newtovenice;62469907]

Originally Posted by Goodnight

I've seen statistics that vary tremendously regarding elective abortions at late term. States report and record data differently, and may have different definitions of what late-term abortion is.

Ranges for elective late-term abortions are from 30% to 80% of all late-term abortions. Which is why I did not include a percent initially because stating a percent with 100% confidence cannot be done because the data isn't there.

Instead I stated that YES there ARE ELECTIVE LATE-TERM ABORTIONS. [Caps for those in the back row.]


But yes, ELECTIVE later-term abortions are performed where perfectly healthy mothers have perfectly healthy babies killed.

That is a fact.

Not unless you can back it up.