Well, The Handmaid's Tale is started - Woman arrested for self-induced abortion in Texas - MERGED (Hispanic, minorities)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm talking about those studies you linked with the 95% OF WOMEN VOLUNTARILY HAVE UNPROTECTED SEX.
The authors concluded efforts to prevent unintended pregnancies should be stepped up by continued and increased funding for title X facilities and programs to reach the target demographic that statistically have the most unintended pregnancies and abortion. This you would know if you had actually read the studies
Apparently those Title X family planning clinics available are not enough. If you understood any thing of human behavior you would realize the fact that there are more family planning clinics that abortion clinics has no relevance here. People dont even register that. When it comes to pleasures they think more in the moment. If an unwanted pregnancy happens desperation will drive them to one of the fewer abortion clinics or to try self induced abortion, as the woman in the OP, or toss their infant in a dumpster.
If PP wanted to continue to take public funding they could separate their business into one that does family planning and one that is for abortion.
The family planning org would accept taxpayer funding to prevent pregnancies.
The abortion arm would raise funds privately to help cover costs for women who cannot afford it.
So single moms can kill their kids because life is hard?
What happens when a the breadwinner in a family of 6 loses his job? Do they get to kill one of the kids to make life "easier"?
Your argument is life is hard so moms should kill their babies to make their life easier?
Sick.
Newsflash: Life is hard. Get over it.
Really? Can you not stop yourself from twisting what someone else said? Enough with the ridiculous accusations!
Single moms have a very difficult time for 15 to 20 years. In YOUR mind that seems to mean they want to kill their kids? How does your mind even come up with this sick nonsense?
Really? Can you not stop yourself from twisting what someone else said? Enough with the ridiculous accusations!
Single moms have a very difficult time for 15 to 20 years. In YOUR mind that seems to mean they want to kill their kids? How does your mind even come up with this sick nonsense?
The argument is that single moms have it so hard. It's an abortion thread.
What other reason is there to bring up the hard lives of single moms in an abortion thread except to use it as an excuse as to why they abort their babies?
Please explain. A bit of honesty would be preferable. TIA.
The argument is that single moms have it so hard. It's an abortion thread.
What other reason is there to bring up the hard lives of single moms in an abortion thread except to use it as an excuse as to why they abort their babies?
Please explain. A bit of honesty would be preferable. TIA.
If you can't tell the difference between aborting a zygote or fetus that has not yet developed and a born human being, I can't help you.
I'm not the one trying to convince others that killing babies for convenience is an awesome thing to do.
PS. I noticed you didn't answer the question. No worries about that.
A zygote or early fetus is not a baby or child, honey.
It has potential, but isn't there yet. Why do you think abortions are traditionally done early in pregnancy? Because most people on this earth don't consider it to be a baby YET.
So no, an abortion is not the same as killing a 6 year old child (for example)
A zygote or early fetus is not a baby or child, honey.
It has potential, but isn't there yet. Why do you think abortions are traditionally done early in pregnancy? Because most people on this earth don't consider it to be a baby YET.
So no, an abortion is not the same as killing a 6 year old child (for example)
Well, it is.
No matter how you want to spin it or ignore basic biology, women carry, have always carried, and WILL always carry babies.
The potential life argument is idiot logic. I have a potential degree from medical school. As do you. Are either of us enrolled? Nope. But we both have potential. I'm also a potential president, a potential navy seal, a potential grammy-award winner.
If the baby was potential life? Well, there would be no need for abortion. Because the life would not be there. There would be nothing to kill.
You do know that abortions kill life right? And that the life is that of a baby? So many pro abortioners get confused by that.
No matter how you want to spin it or ignore basic biology, women carry, have always carried, and WILL always carry babies.
The potential life argument is idiot logic. I have a potential degree from medical school. As do you. Are either of us enrolled? Nope. But we both have potential. I'm also a potential president, a potential navy seal, a potential grammy-award winner.
If the baby was potential life? Well, there would be no need for abortion. Because the life would not be there. There would be nothing to kill.
You do know that abortions kill life right? And that the life is that of a baby? So many pro abortioners get confused by that.
Abortions don't kill 'potential.' They kill LIFE.
Wonder why most of the world disagrees with you.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
