Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No..it's a huge concern for politicians that need a dog and pony show to keep party loyalty.
They sure sucked you in didn't they ?
Nope. Lots of Republican States are considering banning some forms of contraception. Just another step in their quest to control women’s bodies. You don’t care. I get that. Lots of women and men actually do.
"Property rights are universal and absolute." Don't be so sure. It doesn't say that in the Constitution. A lot of us thought that there was a right to privacy. Apparently we were wrong.
When states start outlawing contraception, what will you say then?
They’ll say the same thing they said about Roe. Abortion isn’t banned since it’s legal in some States. Why would they care if the most effective forms of BC are banned if condoms are still available.
No..it's a huge concern for politicians that need a dog and pony show to keep party loyalty.
They sure sucked you in didn't they ?
the real intent is to take attention away from Biden's Presidency. He'll get his report card in November. I wonder when the voting curtain closes if contraception will come to mind as a rationale to vote.
Look for many in the GOP to advocate a ban on all forms of contraception in the near future.
It's scary how many people are willing to vote for Republicans who want all forms of contraception banned and abortion, too. Try finding a Republican running for office willing to just say NO! to the question, "Do you support banning contraception or birth control?" They are too afraid of losing votes and campaign money to just say NO!
Last edited by StillwaterTownie; 07-24-2022 at 03:33 PM..
No State has or would ban women's contraception. A law preventing States to do something they have never done, nor would the ever do at the Federal level is an erroneous waste of their time and our dollars. Keep putting all your eggs in at the Federal level, there will be a Handmaiden's Tale and if the money is good the Democrats will be all for it.
Since the ACA though, they can and will go down this commerce path and you'll be ill pressed to do a darn thing about it. If the FDA doesn't approve it, you can't have it. Government running our healthcare and our insurance plans --- what could go wrong?
We already pay when people don’t use it in the form of Medicaid for prenatal/neonatal care. It doesn’t take a genius to realize that the math for about a $10-20 a month IUD, pill, ring, or other contraceptive is way cheaper than paying for all the visits involved with having a baby. Even with insurance, women tend to spend $5000-6000 out of pocket. The actual hospital bill is likely at least twice or even three times that, especially since there are states that now provide care to new moms for up to a year after delivery now. You can easily provide a woman with contraceptives for all her reproductive life for the cost of delivering one baby.
After all, no one should ever be responsible for one's own self.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
