Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
------------
Lol not as much as I love pissing or Neocon conservatives and Limo liberals as find both out of touch but this issue is truly an issue of EQUAL rights.
Its a win win issue in no way will it affect anyone who isnt gay and life goes on.
If your a Rep and you subscribe to individual rights,less GVMT than you should be for gay marriage .
Gays have a right for same happiness and same misery as rest of us .
Relegion shouldnt be shoved down anyones throat and its ONLY due to relegion that gay marriage is illegal.
That would be fraud, illegal, and no I wouldnt be for that
Quote:
Originally Posted by fierce_flawless
So would it be okay in your book if lesbians married gay guys yet never lived with them or anything else, and continued life with their same sex partners, just so there was the ability to collect SS later on and those benefits didn't 'go to waste'?
Not at all. Your SS retirement benefits will be there for you when you need them. If you decide to marry (a person of the opposite sex) and have children they will benefit also.
You should try to be more civil. Your intolerance and insults are unbecoming of an aging hippie
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl
Are you a 12 year old?
I guess gays should all be able to stop paying taxes then.
So should I!
I’m not married & have no kids.
Oh yeah, and I'm straight.
Not at all. Your SS retirement benefits will be there for you when you need them. If you decide to marry (a person of the opposite sex) and have children they will benefit also.
You should try to be more civil. Your intolerance and insults are unbecoming of an aging hippie
You know, you keep on preaching intolerance towards your views, yet you deny basic rights that SHOULD be granted to EVERYONE to certain citizens of this country.
Heterosexual couples have no more rights to social security than homosexuals. The only difference between them is their sexual preference. They are still citizens of the United States, and they still deserve the same treatment of homosexual couples. Two gay men or women getting married isn't going to affect my marriage or my benefits.
It will add beneficiaries to SS that were not planned for and possibly didnt contribute. And its not just SS its all kinds of insurance, pensions and retirement plans that were put in place based on the marriage of a man and a woman with the purpose of protecting families
Gay marriage is not destroying the sanctity of marriage. If so, then the sanctity of marriage was being destroyed for thousands of years now, what with other cultures practicing gay marriage.
It will add beneficiaries to SS that were not planned for and possibly didnt contribute. And its not just SS its all kinds of insurance, pensions and retirement plans that were put in place based on the marriage of a man and a woman with the purpose of protecting families
Everyone who works most likely contributes to SS. Why shouldn't a homosexual couple get out of it when a straight couple can? Why can't they protect their families?
They can. If a gay man reproduces his child and that childs guardian are protected.
Not their gay partner
Quote:
Originally Posted by Langlen
Everyone who works most likely contributes to SS. Why shouldn't a homosexual couple get out of it when a straight couple can? Why can't they protect their families?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.