Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-25-2013, 12:18 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimuelojones View Post
All insurers must provide the basic coverage. If a policy only provide 3 of the 15 critiria of coverage, then they must modify their policies.

What do want your medical insurance policy to cover and offer? What services should they cover?
It's not what YOU want anymore..it's what the government mandates.

There were people just fine with the coverage they had but Uncle Sam decided it wasn't good enough so now they have nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-25-2013, 12:21 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,889,770 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
It's not what YOU want anymore..it's what the government mandates.

There were people just fine with the coverage they had but Uncle Sam decided it wasn't good enough so now they have nothing.
And there were people who had no coverage who now are finding affordable coverage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2013, 12:22 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,758,281 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by marcopolo View Post
Oh, wonderful advice! Thank you!

So a fifty-something couple with health trouble can "go for the ACA gold" at a cost of $1,961.44 monthly, and get a nice low $500 deductible and an out of pocket maximum of $7,000 for the couple. So on an annual basis, add up your $23,500 in premiums plus your $7,000 in out of pocket costs and you get total health outlays of $30,500. And this is not Health Savings Account compliant so there are no breaks on costs.

What is getting cancelled January 1 costs me $1,010 monthly with an out of pocket maximum for the couple of $6,000. On an annual basis, about $18,000 total health outlays, worst case. And that is HSA compliant so there was a tax break on out-of-pocket.

Follow closely: $30,500 in costs is WORSE than $18,000 in costs. Ask someone who knows arithmetic if you do not believe me.
What state and what's the lifetime cap on your current policy?
The killer with individual policies has always been the insurer's right to not renew if the insured party was diagnosed with a situation they would rather not insure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2013, 12:26 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,758,281 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by marcopolo View Post
You do realize that a $10 million lifetime cap is a "non ACA compliant cap," don't you? You gonna blow through that in a heartbeat?

I wish people would stop acting like the 85% of us that had insurance before ACA and liked it just fine are like children who could not possibly understand the complexities.

Reputable insurers have always met their obligations on claims. Most people had no trouble with insurance pre-ACA. Were there unaddressed problems and issues and things that needed fixing? YES. Obamacare will turn out to be one of the failures on the road to eventual success. Let's admit it and get on down the road.
The majority of soon to be former individual policies were sub prime. Many assumed all insurance was alike and only later learned they were seriously underinsured.

I am always delighted to find common ground with anyone. Seems we both believe ACA is nothing more than a step to something else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2013, 12:28 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,971,219 times
Reputation: 2177
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
And there were people who had no coverage who now are finding affordable coverage.
How's it affordable? The prices have gone up for almost everyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2013, 12:29 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,971,219 times
Reputation: 2177
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
The majority of soon to be former individual policies were sub prime. Many assumed all insurance was alike and only later learned they were seriously underinsured.
Just like some people assume government can reduce the cost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2013, 12:30 PM
 
Location: Free From The Oppressive State
30,257 posts, read 23,746,924 times
Reputation: 38644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
Mom, is it taxpayer money paying you to post here?
I was JUST about to post something similar. I have never seen someone so vehemently defend that which even other members of their own party can admit is a colossal failure. It is truly astounding.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2013, 12:32 PM
 
Location: Oxygen Ln. AZ
9,319 posts, read 18,751,508 times
Reputation: 5764
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
And there were people who had no coverage who now are finding affordable coverage.
So the people losing their coverage is of no interest to you.....got it. All the ACA managed to do was switch people around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2013, 12:33 PM
 
5,064 posts, read 5,731,609 times
Reputation: 4770
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
We probably could debate a definition of "abuse" till the cows come home. I think most reasonable folk can agree that it minimally includes fraud, no?

Welfare benefits are all operated at the state level. Some states put more resources into preventing and detecting fraud than others.

Nothing short of a communistic approach towards reproduction will prevent people from having children they cannot afford. I am personally cool with this. How about you?
I disagree with that. Give people a box of food, and cut off all cash assistance. Cut off free daycare to non working moms- leave only preK programs to help get kids ready for school. Take away Obamaphones.
When the only benefit to having a child is a little more milk, cheese and fruit in your box, many people will stop having "unplanned" children.

People on welfare are having children at a much higher rate than people who pay their on way. So it's time to change the system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2013, 12:33 PM
 
Location: Oxygen Ln. AZ
9,319 posts, read 18,751,508 times
Reputation: 5764
Quote:
Originally Posted by Three Wolves In Snow View Post
I was JUST about to post something similar. I have never seen someone so vehemently defend that which even other members of their own party can admit is a colossal failure. It is truly astounding.
Even CBS gets it now...it is amazing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:41 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top