Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-14-2014, 07:34 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
Did someone post proof that every one of the families of the approximately 200 kids getting dinner receive SNAP?
It's very likely. The school has a 75% free lunch rate. Another 6% get reduced-price lunch.

San Elizario High School in San Elizario, TX

 
Old 05-14-2014, 07:36 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
89% is the number courtesy of the USDA (which I posted earlier in this thread).
So about 178 of those 200 kids come from families on SNAP.
More recent stats. Thanks!
 
Old 05-14-2014, 07:41 AM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,300,068 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
How is it that you can't grasp the concept of having to pay for the same thing twice?

I'd really like to know why you can't seem to understand that concept.

Go to the store. Buy a gallon of milk. The price is $4.50, but you have to pay $9.00.

What about that double payment do you not understand?
Because its not true and your point is irrational.

Whenever the food gets eaten at home, that student and the family still ate the food.

The food stamp program exists to provide food to a family for a month. This food can be eaten at any hour in that month, any day of that month etc.

You create this weird and strange understanding of the program and then carry it to double dipping and all of these weird projections that don't make sense because the goal of the program is to provide food for families for one month at a time, not for specific meals and not for specific times. You don't have to sign a food stamp pledge that you'll eat lunch on Tuesdays at 12noon. SMH
 
Old 05-14-2014, 07:42 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,722,740 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
Did someone post proof that every one of the families of the approximately 200 kids getting dinner receive SNAP?
If so, please do point me to that post.
If not, the above comments are nothing more than mean-spirited speculation.
I would sure hope we taxpayers aren't having to feed the children of the wealthy also. I'm sure they are on food stamps. Otherwise no way should the taxpayers have to buy their free food.
 
Old 05-14-2014, 07:43 AM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,300,068 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Why are taxpayers paying for kids' free meals at school that their parents get food stamps to provide?

Why aren't food stamp benefits reduced accordingly for free meals provided at school?
Whenever the food gets eaten at home, that student and the family still ate the food.

The food stamp program exists to provide food to a family for a month. This food can be eaten at any hour in that month, any day of that month etc.

You create this weird and strange understanding of the program and then carry it to double dipping and all of these weird projections that don't make sense because the goal of the program is to provide food for families for one month at a time, not for specific meals and not for specific times. You don't have to sign a food stamp pledge that you'll eat lunch on Tuesdays at 12noon. SMH
 
Old 05-14-2014, 07:43 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,519,997 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
I would sure hope we taxpayers aren't having to feed the children of the wealthy also. I'm sure they are on food stamps. Otherwise no way should the taxpayers have to buy their free food.
Free lunch goes to 133% of FPL.
Reduced lunch goes to 185% of FPL.

It reaches middle class, not the wealthy.
 
Old 05-14-2014, 07:44 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,722,740 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
Did someone post proof that every one of the families of the approximately 200 kids getting dinner receive SNAP?
If so, please do point me to that post.
If not, the above comments are nothing more than mean-spirited speculation.
I really think people would be even more upset if these were rich kids filling their faces at taxpayer expense.
 
Old 05-14-2014, 07:44 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,713,235 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
It's very likely. The school has a 75% free lunch rate. Another 6% get reduced-price lunch.

San Elizario High School in San Elizario, TX
"Likely" is not proof of all.
Unless it can be proven that every single family is "double-dipping" as you call it, anyone who suggests such is either speculating or lying.
Take your pick.
 
Old 05-14-2014, 07:47 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,722,740 times
Reputation: 22474
I'm going along with schools feeding these kids -- but we should end the food stamp programs because the parents are using the food stamps to buy expensive cuts of beef, all sorts of junk food. They can spend their child's allotment for big weekend parties -- and believe me -- these people have big weekend parties. They can sell them for liquor, beer, whatever.

The food stamp program is filled with fraud and abuse -- the children aren't being fed by their parents, the taxpayers are having to cough up the money for the free meals at schools. Just have one or the other -- no reason at all for both.
 
Old 05-14-2014, 07:49 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
Because its not true and your point is irrational.
Taxpayers are paying TWICE to provide kids the same meals. Once via food stamps, and then a 2nd time via free meals at school.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top