Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Pro Football
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-28-2015, 07:07 PM
FBJ
 
Location: Tall Building down by the river
39,605 posts, read 59,037,300 times
Reputation: 9451

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJG View Post
It's coming...
I hope so because you know how fast 3 years can fly by in the NFL. It doesn't have feel like Andy Reid has been good 3 years from the eagles so you know it can fly by so quickly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-29-2015, 02:58 PM
 
Location: The "Rock"
2,551 posts, read 2,897,070 times
Reputation: 1354
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
what is wrong with hundley or petty?
What's Petty's bowl record? I'm not keen on the Baylor offense and Big12 QBs as a whole. I know that's not a good reason. But the recent ones seem to be struggling... Tannehill is probably doing the best and I wouldn't want him either. These kids are stat guys... I want a winner. Not a stat guy.

Hundley is just inconsistent. Fine if we get him in a REALLY late round. But I would rather wait on a better prospect than either of those guys. I'm just tired of us settling for adequate.

None of them are better than Weeden in my opinion, so we may as well stick with him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2015, 03:56 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,858,743 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. GE View Post
What's Petty's bowl record? I'm not keen on the Baylor offense and Big12 QBs as a whole. I know that's not a good reason. But the recent ones seem to be struggling... Tannehill is probably doing the best and I wouldn't want him either. These kids are stat guys... I want a winner. Not a stat guy.

Hundley is just inconsistent. Fine if we get him in a REALLY late round. But I would rather wait on a better prospect than either of those guys. I'm just tired of us settling for adequate.

None of them are better than Weeden in my opinion, so we may as well stick with him.
i can see your point, but i think hundley gets a bad rap for taking too many sacks when playing behind an inexperienced offensive line, and it also doesnt help his consistency either. as for petty, he did lose the only two bowl games he played in, but the last game he played in he threw for 550 yards, and nearly won that game.

i think both players are much better than weedon is, and besides i dont think the cowboys can wait for anu solomon to graduate(he is a freshmen).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2015, 05:14 PM
 
Location: The "Rock"
2,551 posts, read 2,897,070 times
Reputation: 1354
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
i think both players are much better than weedon is, and besides i dont think the cowboys can wait for anu solomon to graduate(he is a freshmen).
I hear ya on them being better prospects than Weeden. They probably are... I only say keep Weeden because we already have him and I don't think are worth more than another draft pick. And Weeden is cheap.

Barring injury we don't need a QB for 2 or 3+ years. I would just rather use the pick on a DB and DL where we have serious needs. A LB wouldn't be a bad idea either...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2015, 02:00 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,858,743 times
Reputation: 20030
so dallas has decided to stick with beefing up their defense this time around, four defensive players, a DE, CB, and two LBs, and one OT. we shall see what they have in mind for their two seventh round picks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2015, 06:53 PM
JJG JJG started this thread
 
Location: Fort Worth
13,612 posts, read 22,914,174 times
Reputation: 7643
Default How do you grade this year's draft?

Round 1, Pick 27 (27) -- Byron Jones CB
Round 2, Pick 28 (60) -- Randy Gregory DE
Round 3, Pick 27 (91) -- Chaz Greeen OT
Round 4, Pick 28 (127) -- Damien Wilson LB
Round 5, Pick 27 (163) -- Ryan Russell DE
Round 7, Pick 19 (236) -- Mark Nzeocha LB
Round 7, Pick 26 (243) -- Laurence Gibson OT
Round 7, Pick 29 (246) -- Geoff Swaim TE
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2015, 12:41 AM
 
Location: VA
796 posts, read 505,564 times
Reputation: 327
No pick used for a RB???

I assume Randle, Dunbar and McFadden gonna be used as a trio....hope they can keep a good run game to take some weight off Romo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2015, 01:17 AM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,858,743 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by VABlkCONSERV View Post
No pick used for a RB???

I assume Randle, Dunbar and McFadden gonna be used as a trio....hope they can keep a good run game to take some weight off Romo.
yep, running back by committee again. maybe it will work this time, or perhaps one will step up and become the number one back. i figure either mcfadden or randle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2015, 03:21 PM
 
Location: East Texas, with the Clan of the Cave Bear
3,266 posts, read 5,636,125 times
Reputation: 4763
I think McFadden will be featured But I think the 'Boys have talent at RB. I think Gurley and Gordon were the RB's on their radar but obviously fell off before the 'Boys could pick.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2015, 04:49 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,858,743 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobTex View Post
I think McFadden will be featured But I think the 'Boys have talent at RB. I think Gurley and Gordon were the RB's on their radar but obviously fell off before the 'Boys could pick.
those two may have been on the boys radar, but they were not interested enough to trade up to get them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Pro Football
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:25 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top