Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-04-2016, 01:30 PM
 
Location: Ono Island, Orange Beach, AL
10,743 posts, read 13,396,965 times
Reputation: 7183
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
The Vegas Strip is a horrible car-centric, super block, fortress-style development that is meant to trap visitors inside. Don't we have enough of that with all the government buildings?
What's even worse, it is a showcase of drunks, folks throwing up, con artists, prostitutes, litter galore and God only knows what else. Heck, the cars are the least of the problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-04-2016, 01:30 PM
 
4,010 posts, read 3,755,620 times
Reputation: 1967
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
The Vegas Strip is a horrible car-centric, super block, fortress-style development that is meant to trap visitors inside. Don't we have enough of that with all the government buildings?
Cherry picking..

Nobody mentioned this when the Falcons were talking about building a new stadium or any of the other new developments downtown
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2016, 01:45 PM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,882,415 times
Reputation: 5703
Quote:
Originally Posted by fieldm View Post
Cherry picking..

Nobody mentioned this when the Falcons were talking about building a new stadium or any of the other new developments downtown
Absolutely many people are upset that Int'l Blvd is not being extended to connect with Northside Dr and create a grid, but a MUP connection was proposed. GWCC is a state agency, they require no rezoning, so there is little the public can do to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2016, 02:01 PM
 
Location: Prescott, AZ
5,559 posts, read 4,697,514 times
Reputation: 2284
Quote:
Originally Posted by fieldm View Post
I feel what you are saying but nobody cared about "black-hole block" block with TF or the new Falcons stadium but now its a problem but it is what it is
That's straight up false.

People have been caring about Turner Field's impact on the surrounding neighborhood for years and years. Now that the Braves are gone, we can finally actually DO something about it. Notice how we're not keeping it the same super block of parking lots. We're filling it in with development, and connecting it with transit, and people couldn't be more happy to see it finally happen.

The Falcons Stadium has also been criticized for its impacts on the surrounding neighborhoods. Unlike Turner Field, however, the Falcons have put their money where their mouth is and matched a lot of city funds going into the area for new parks, and infrastructure projects. Similarly, we're seeing transit and increased development going into the area soon, if not already.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2016, 04:39 PM
 
561 posts, read 781,723 times
Reputation: 686
There's nothing that says we HAVE to allow MGM to build a casino that doesn't incorporate urbanism. Just because their other casinos are fortresses that don't integrate well with the street doesn't mean we can't require them to it differently here.

Hell, even big box stores have proven they can integrate urbanism when required to do so.

Let's not be so closed-minded and apply Vegas (and other cities) logic to what will be built in Atlanta. We can demand different!

I believe that people should be allowed to throw away their money in any manner they like (even though I'm not much of a gambler).

Let's just get the zoning and building requirements correct for something built into a vibrant downtown.

Also, the "Casino's bring crime" old mentality is on par with the "MARTA brings black people go to the suburbs to commit crimes" crap. Let's not generalize and stereotype things without having actual factual recent data on this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2016, 04:59 PM
 
10,974 posts, read 10,882,447 times
Reputation: 3435
Yeah, my issue is mostly with the large mega-casino format.

If they want to fit into an existing historic-type downtown building with minimal parking, then that is fine. But I just don't see them doing that. So let them locate in some other part of the metro.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2016, 05:04 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
5,242 posts, read 6,242,434 times
Reputation: 2784
If downtown didn't have so much going for it right now, the location may be optimal. I used to think that the gulch would be a good area for a casino, but two things have changed since those posts:

1. Downtown has a lot of momentum right now, more than ever in my lifetime. There is a good chance that this will become a great urban neighborhood, a casino is not going to help that. Downtown just doesn't need it.

2. I went to the Hard Rock Casino in Tampa. Yes it's FL, but it's a pretty nice looking place. The people though... they looked so sad. It's the same look you see on the people who look so desperate playing those insane gas station slot machines already here. It's bad stuff for many people.

But, I don't want to legislate my moral stance and ban it completely. That desire for personal freedom overrides what really is common sense, a casino would cause more bad than good in Georgia. We shouldn't ban it, but downtown would not be an optimal location. O, and the Casino needs to pay well to play in GA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2016, 05:18 PM
 
Location: Prescott, AZ
5,559 posts, read 4,697,514 times
Reputation: 2284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mossberg View Post
There's nothing that says we HAVE to allow MGM to build a casino that doesn't incorporate urbanism. Just because their other casinos are fortresses that don't integrate well with the street doesn't mean we can't require them to it differently here.

Hell, even big box stores have proven they can integrate urbanism when required to do so.

Let's not be so closed-minded and apply Vegas (and other cities) logic to what will be built in Atlanta. We can demand different!

I believe that people should be allowed to throw away their money in any manner they like (even though I'm not much of a gambler).

Let's just get the zoning and building requirements correct for something built into a vibrant downtown.

Also, the "Casino's bring crime" old mentality is on par with the "MARTA brings black people go to the suburbs to commit crimes" crap. Let's not generalize and stereotype things without having actual factual recent data on this.
Fair enough, but until they come with a full on plan with how to engage the sidewalks, bring business to the rest of the neighborhood and not kill the block, I don't think it's too much of a stretch to consider that they will do what they've done pretty much everywhere else.

I look forward to reviewing the plan should they ever make one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2016, 10:47 AM
 
Location: Atlanta
376 posts, read 330,822 times
Reputation: 302
Look, as long as Nathan Deal is governor there isn't going to be any casino anywhere in GA so everyone might as well put this whole discussion on the shelf for at least the next couple of years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2016, 03:22 PM
 
770 posts, read 604,211 times
Reputation: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTravelinMan View Post
Look, as long as Nathan Deal is governor there isn't going to be any casino anywhere in GA so everyone might as well put this whole discussion on the shelf for at least the next couple of years.
Based on everything I've read regarding casinos, it's bad news, it runs the area around it into the ground, creates greater poverty and income inequality.

The one area I could see it being a potential thing is a walkway from the airport directly, though there is no land.

Downtown has enough going on and it's growing on its own, it also needs to stop being a tourist trap and become a more livable, desirable destination, a casino would only continue that trend and assure that Downtown will be nothing more than a tourist trap.

I still don't like it, but I could see at the airport making sense as they are trying to hit up people passing through and of course GA has to get a huge cut for it to make sense.

Though I can agree with the fact that Deal won't approve it, which is fine by me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:26 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top