Quote:
Originally Posted by citoyen
Interesting.
So Russians who try to present the ukrainian nation as a soviet creation. Use a supposedly quote of Bismark to present the ukrainian war as an agression from western world?
|
Well, let's dissect your post a bit, that I would better understand it.
First of all, Russians don't try to present that "Ukrainian nation" was a "Soviet creation."
What they are saying, is that Ukraine in
its today's borders is a Soviet creation.
But since Ukraine was part of the Russian Empire way before Soviet authorities came in place, this is how Russians see the creation of modern state of Ukraine overall, looking from historic perspective;
As you can see on this map, the red represents the actual borders of Ukraine by the 1654 ( the year of
Pereyaslav Treaty ( I see already some nonsense there - apparently Ukrainians managed to "edit" recently the original article
) but never the less the fact remains - this is the year when Ukrainians asked for protection of the Russian tzar from Polish oppression. ( Since obviously they were Orthodox, while Poland (or rather
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth at that time) was Catholic. So the MAJORITY of today's Ukrainian lands belonged to Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, and next yellow color that you see on the map are the lands that Russian tzars adjoined to Ukraine, when they defeated the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, which from what I remember was regarded as Polish "golden age." ( Keep this in mind, because THIS is a source of the Polish bitterness towards Russia, and never-ending "wet dream" of the likes of Brzezinski to get back at Russia, to weaken it and to break it apart. And Ukraine of course (that used to belong to Poland) is a big part of the *game* ( That's why Poland was "brokering" the deal of the whole "Ukraine joining the EU" thing - it was supposed to give Poland more clout in EU.)
But back to the map. So yellow color represents the lands that Russian tzars adjoined to Ukraine, "blue" territories were adjoined to Ukrainian Republic by Lenin in the beginning of the Soviet era, in spite of their initial resistance. Lenin explained that without these lands Ukraine would not have any industrial base whatsoever, (which was true) and wouldn't be viable as a Republic within the USSR, being too dependent on Russian Republic.
Then green territories were adjoined to Ukraine by Stalin of course, right before and after the WWII, and violet ( Crimea) was *gifted* to Ukraine by Khrushev a bit later, in 1954.
So yes, that's how Russians see the creation of today's Ukrainian state in its today's borders.
And since Ukraine has been part of Russia since 1654, obviously they see an attempt to break it away ( take it out of the sphere of the Russian influence in this case) as a Western aggression, an attempt of the West to use Ukraine against the Russian interests.
At that they quote ( supposedly) Bismarck, trying to prove that the "collective West" was harboring such plans already for long time, which of course has got nothing to do with Bismarck who as we all know was German politician and had very favorable opinion of Russia ( if not to say that he outright believed that the future German prosperity depended on peaceful coexistence with Russians, which would have prevented the French-Russian alliance, that he was weary of in the future.)
But I digress here, however going back to the subject - the plans to severe Ukraine from Russia were actually not cooked in Germany, but in Washington, and Brzesinsky the Pole ( ironically so) was behind it.
Then Poland was pushing the whole deal in the EU on behalf of American interests.
P.S. BTW erasure is "she," otherwise she wouldn't be posting Haute Couture videos in Fashion forum)))