Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The group (PEACH) who was said to have created the handout was a group of Jewish mothers. Without seeing the pamphlet, I have no idea if it’s propaganda or not.
There is a clear description of the contents of the pamphlet in the link I gave, and it is Jewish nurses who are countering the misinformation in it.
Even if you don’t like the pamphlet, you can’t really censor them for sharing their beliefs.
I can't open it without installing some new program, so I'm going to pass. I'm sure it's the same old drivel I've read a million times before, anyway. I did look at Suzy's link. I was impressed with the Orthodox Jewish Nurses Association. That's what the Somalis did in MN too, they got Somali health care providers to talk to people in their own cultural manner about why they should vaccinate.
That's pretty much what the Tobacco Industry said regarding the research that was signaling risk from smoking. To refute it with 'science-based' evidence; they formed the Tobacco Research Institute with research facilities all over the world & developed their own method of epidemiology , designed to mitigate risk; that is now used in vaccine risk studies.
My life experience is not 'unsupported evidence', any more than the hundreds of thousands of lung cancer deaths of smokers was 'unsupported evidence'. Thanks to flawed epidemiology; two decades of smoking-related mortality continued unchecked; until the Surgeon Generals report in 1964, which was largely the product of underground whistle blowers who provided corporate documents.
My legal argument is very well supported. Epidemiology is admissable evidence but not for causation.
The desired outcome for the epidemiology of vaccine risk is for there to not be a statistically significant risk. Using Big Tobacco epidemiology; this is easily done. The etiology of most of the adverse events claimed to be caused by vaccines; continues to point to the vaccines. Since it assumes the hypothesis that vaccines are safe is untrue; that becomes the null hypothesis.
The only way for the epidemiology that vaccines are safe to be considered 'proved'; is for vaccines to be found as safe. Has anyone ever proved that vaccines are safe?
So the null hypothesis has not been found to be untrue. Therefore; the hypothesis that vaccines are safe; including all that crap epidemiology; has not been proven.
Vaccinate away to your hearts content. Consider yourself 'immune' from VPD's & leave my child's exemptions alone, because all you have is a yet-to-be-proved hypothesis & I already KNOW that vaccines can kill & injure my children.
One unproven hypothesis is as good as another unproven hypothesis. Research supported conclusions are far different. I suspect you know this but are unwilling or unable (perhaps rightfully) to acknowledge this.
I can't open it without installing some new program, so I'm going to pass. I'm sure it's the same old drivel I've read a million times before, anyway. I did look at Suzy's link. I was impressed with the Orthodox Jewish Nurses Association. That's what the Somalis did in MN too, they got Somali health care providers to talk to people in their own cultural manner about why they should vaccinate.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
