Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
putting Wall street is taking people's jobs and them overseas. Why do we have the TSA? The department of homeland security? The short answer is to protect the powers that be form us the general public because they have decided to cash out the middle class in America and invest in foreign countries. This is a source of undirected anger.
If you think the TSA and The Department of Homeland Security are about stopping terrorism think again. Want to fly on an airliner? we get to touch your junk if we want too.
Is much truth to this Cashing out the middle class in America and investing in foreign countries, also bringing us down with millions of illegal aliens...again to cash out the middle class and further devastate the poor. It's corporate globalism, there isn't a single president since Nafta who is not a corporate globalist ruled by corporate elitists and big banks, who control our media. Now they encourage illegals to vote by millions to stay in power, as in CA and NV, read it on CA's SEIU site. Globalists have had everything figured out to the letter, years ago. We have no voice unless we vote third party OR for one of few tea party conservatives like Ron or Rand Paul. We have only 10,000 sq. ft. or less of unpopulated land left in U.S. states wikipedia? It's extremely unpleasant living in parts of So. Ca. these days, goin further down the drain. If gov wanted to use fema camps for poor they would have done it by now, if they wanted to stop illegal migration they would've done it long ago, easily.
For those who don't have family or friends to fall back on, isn't is really government and business's responsibility to provide for some kind of housing? I mean, we bailed out Wall Street. Now it's their turn. What's your opinion?
Explain to me what is mean about my comments. Or do you think that the people in those camps that I'm paying for should sit around eating bon bons all day?
Sorry, the curse of the written word. It was tongue in cheek but, alas, the closest smiley is a wink. Again, sorry for the confusion.
Better keep an eye on your junk, sweetpea.......if you advocate taking someone elses, you better believe someone is thinking about taking away yours.
Read again, perhaps a bit more slowly. I'm certainly not advocating that government should be big enough to take away everything, because only that same government would be big enough and powerful enough to provide "everything needed - cradle to grave." What I do advocate is that people be more self-dependent and not rely on the government to supply life's needs as was stated in the opening question in this thread.
Was that clear or shall I type this again using smaller words?
Is much truth to this Cashing out the middle class in America and investing in foreign countries, also bringing us down with millions of illegal aliens...again to cash out the middle class and further devastate the poor. It's corporate globalism, there isn't a single president since Nafta who is not a corporate globalist ruled by corporate elitists and big banks, who control our media. Now they encourage illegals to vote by millions to stay in power, as in CA and NV, read it on CA's SEIU site. Globalists have had everything figured out to the letter, years ago. We have no voice unless we vote third party OR for one of few tea party conservatives like Ron or Rand Paul. We have only 10,000 sq. ft. or less of unpopulated land left in U.S. states wikipedia? It's extremely unpleasant living in parts of So. Ca. these days, goin further down the drain. If gov wanted to use fema camps for poor they would have done it by now, if they wanted to stop illegal migration they would've done it long ago, easily.
Perhaps in the end, it is best if homeless fend for themselves as suggested
I also suggest we cut not just a little, but all military, because it only benefits big business, interstate commerce and the government.
Let them fend for themselves as well.
That would save a lot of money and shrink the government.
As many posters elaborated. It is my money and if they want it, they have to pay for it
Of course, that also works well with the world government plans too come to think of it...
Likewise, I wish my tax dollars did not go for bailing out the greedy banks.
A parasite needs to die sooner or later, and the long term benefits will far exceed any short term negative benefits.
Was that clear or shall I type this again using smaller words?
If it makes you feel better about yourself, who am I to tell you what to do?
Hold the hyperbole, it doesnt help your argument.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
