Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You says it was limitation in freedom of speech, it’s not.
How else are we supposed to stop kids that encourage each other to commit mass murder from online sites? What do you propose? It’s called background check. If they’re discussing ideas for mass murder on sites known for harboring mass murderers, they can’t get a gun. Too many people have been killed this way.
Confiscating guns or prohibiting people from buying them because of what they said is absolutely restricting their free speech under todays laws.
But now you are calling it a "background check" to try and gloss over it?
A background check is looking for CRIMINAL activity, speech is not a criminal activity, such as domestic violence.
Do you really believe what you are saying isn't a restriction on free speech?
My proposal is to actually enforce many of the laws we have in place, which we dont currently do.
Confiscating guns or prohibiting people from buying them because of what they said is absolutely restricting their free speech under todays laws.
But now you are calling it a "background check" to try and gloss over it?
A background check is looking for CRIMINAL activity, speech is not a criminal activity, such as domestic violence.
Do you really believe what you are saying isn't a restriction on free speech?
My proposal is to actually enforce many of the laws we have in place, which we dont currently do.
What is scary as people like this can vote, and now we are realizing how people like Maxine Waters and AOC get elected. They have crazy lunatics that do not understand the constitution voting them in.
That’s it?
That’s a lot less effort than what you typed before defending 4chan.
I thought you’d come up with at least more than one.
I didn't defend a particular website, I've seen 4chan its a dumpster fire, but I don't have to like the particular speech to defend it.
It's one example but there are plenty more. Our politicians love to add regulation to what they already can't enforce. After Bernie Madoff and the financial crisis, they wanted to add all kinds of additional regulations, meanwhile they ignored warnings about Madoff suspicious activity WHILE SEC employees were literally surfing the web for porn at work.
If we enforced the current laws, we could prevent lots of problems.
OH, and actually my "one example" is really 60k examples of one of the most important ways to stop guns from getting into the hands of the wrong people... But I get it, that fact ruins your political rant, it's cool. Just be honest that you don't care about real examples, and you would rather be duped by politicians looking for more power and more money by taking advantage of easily fooled and gullible people who think we need more laws, when in reality it's our government not doing what they previously agreed to do. There's a sucker born every minute, and unfortunately they vote for the manipulators we put in charge.
Because you can't kill 20 children in 15 minutes without a gun! That's NRA hogwash your drinking up.
Or a crock pot, or a moving van, or fertilizer or tainted kool-aid, or a jumbo jet.... Or any other creative means we have seen already.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
