Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-27-2014, 05:46 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, California
4,373 posts, read 3,229,965 times
Reputation: 1041

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by tillman7 View Post
Since gay marriage is here, it is time to allow heterosexual men to have multiple wives? Will America fight to allow men to have more then one wife since we marching? I mean as a straight man my rights are being denied.
Slippery slope argument fallacy. Gotta love it.

 
Old 02-27-2014, 06:50 PM
 
2,089 posts, read 1,418,277 times
Reputation: 3105
Let's allow anyone to marry whoever they want, even if Grandpa wants to marry his 18 year old granddaughter. That way he can put his property into joint tenancy and when he dies his multimillion estate will bypass inheritance taxes. Hey, anything to beat the tax man.
 
Old 02-27-2014, 07:20 PM
 
6,790 posts, read 8,200,598 times
Reputation: 6998
The slippery slope from from same sex marriage to polygamy does not hold any water, it never has.

If you look objectively at marriage laws and benefits it's very clearly designed for binding TWO people as family with all the benefits and obligations of next of kin status. Only two, no more, no less, the gender of those two people is not legally relevant. Based on the constitution, we should not deny a same sex couple access to these clearly defined rights that are in existence for all other couples.

Gay marriage will not create any obligation to create an entirely new set of marriage rights for polygamous unions, adding polygamy into the mix would require changing the existing laws, same sex marriage does not (ignoring all the DOMA nonsense that was just an attempt to make discrimination legal) and coming up with new provisions for additional spouses such as who makes ultimate life and death decisions, (can you imagine the lawsuits if spouses disagree?) tax law, SS benefits, healthcare benefits, and childcare decisions would be all seriously affected.

This argument is nonsense, and always has been.

Last edited by detshen; 02-27-2014 at 07:29 PM..
 
Old 02-28-2014, 01:40 AM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,778,898 times
Reputation: 7020
Slippery slope supporters are too dense to realize the top of the slippery slope is heterosexual marriage, thus we must ban that to stop anything else stemming from it.
 
Old 02-28-2014, 02:33 AM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,511 posts, read 33,321,730 times
Reputation: 7623
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix C View Post
^^call it what it is-homosexual marriage and heterosexual marriage. Do not hide behind euphemisms. If it is natural and normal there is no need to hide.

Gay is something Fred and Barney did around Bedrock not Brokeback Mountain.
Fred and Barney were married (the normal way, to women) and were regular men. Don't try to twist cartoon characters to something sick.
 
Old 02-28-2014, 03:58 AM
 
Location: Whoville....
25,386 posts, read 35,551,149 times
Reputation: 14692
Quote:
Originally Posted by daylux View Post
Sure why not, its America anything goes now.
We've been working towards that goal for some time now.

I can't think of a valid argument for why we should allow gay marriage but not allow polygamy. If marriage is now about partnering with anyone you love, who are we to tell people how many someone's they can love?
 
Old 02-28-2014, 04:00 AM
 
16,431 posts, read 22,204,998 times
Reputation: 9623
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivorytickler View Post
We've been working towards that goal for some time now.
How about throwing fundamental Christians into an arena with hungry lions? That ought to get some huge ratings!
 
Old 02-28-2014, 04:21 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,389,506 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
I would agree completely, but only as long as you also allow heterosexual women to have multiple husbands.


Works for me!

I'm tired of the single life sausage fest.
 
Old 02-28-2014, 04:26 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,389,506 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
There may be compelling reasons to outlaw at least male + wives polygamy. In US locales where that is practiced, like Colorado City AZ, it becomes a tremendous burden on government as the male is not able to support all the children that are produced (women don't work outside of the home).


Why would you assume that the multiples wouldn't work outside the home?
 
Old 02-28-2014, 04:37 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,389,506 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by TriMT7 View Post
LOL @ the "get government out of marriage" argument - the last refuge of anti-gay marriage dead-enders.

"We don't want to share so destroy it all!"


Too bad your great idea about "getting government out of marriage" was never a serious idea until the gays came along looking to gain equal access to what is rightfully theirs as free tax paying citizens, huh?


You guys couldn't be more transparent if you tried.

Am I supposed to not notice homosexuals want to marry members of their own sex because they believe the stigma of being gay will be removed once the state implies homosexuality is equal to heterosexuality by enshrining same-sex unions with marital legalese?

Did someone say "transparent"?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:45 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top