Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-14-2019, 02:53 PM
 
1,203 posts, read 618,753 times
Reputation: 874

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by vkhmini View Post
Of course they're not trained in that. My acquaintance -- the one who lost her license for telling her patients to eat healthier -- told me that they get all of two days of nutritional instruction in medical school.
Are you sure that is the true reason why that occurred? It's very rare for a license to be lost. More commonly they will require extra education in the deficit area. The most common reason to lose a license is to be caught multiple times using improperly addicting drugs.

Go online and look up the actual board order to see the true reason. Diet does have its place in therapy but if you swear by diet alone and nothing else, that can be malpractice.

 
Old 10-14-2019, 02:59 PM
 
4,921 posts, read 7,691,766 times
Reputation: 5482
The medical industry is a for profit entity. They do not make money from the healthy or the dead. Therefore they specialize in keeping us alive enough to pay their bills.

This means is that our health is up to us individually. Each one of us has the responsibility for our own well-being. There is a ton of information available to all on healthy living. The medical profession is wonderful if you need surgery, but otherwise, it is doesn't have a clue.

Our bodies will heal itself if we remove the toxins and eat and drink healthy foods.
However if you think you can frequent fast food joints and suck up diet sodas and the like I suggest making arrangements with an undertaker.
 
Old 10-14-2019, 03:13 PM
 
13,962 posts, read 5,628,343 times
Reputation: 8619
Quote:
Originally Posted by donsabi View Post
This means is that our health is up to us individually. Each one of us has the responsibility for our own well-being. There is a ton of information available to all on healthy living. The medical profession is wonderful if you need surgery, but otherwise, it is doesn't have a clue.
This.

And honestly, anyone seeing a nutritionist could get better info at the same price by doing the following:
  • Google the words "good nutrition"
  • Take the money you would have paid a nutritionist and light it on fire.
More info, same cost.
 
Old 10-14-2019, 03:13 PM
 
21,382 posts, read 7,949,172 times
Reputation: 18156
Quote:
Originally Posted by Volobjectitarian View Post
On this - I look at doctors like 1st level tech support who in their spare time might have a really serious specialty in the world of computing. But if you asked that tech support about a specific program you should run to keep your PC healthy, you'd get 1,000 different answers if you asked 1,000 people.

And this isn't directed at your comment, just that your comment got me thinking...

As an IT person married to a nurse, I remark on this similar "you are supposed to know everything I am about to ask about" mentality we both get all the time, when the fact is, for a lot of people in a lot of jobs, they know THEIR thing and not much outside of it. It's my main issue with doctors, because like them, I am expected to know everything under the Sun about ALL technology ever. Sad fact - I don't and neither does any pro, educated, multi-degreed geek like me. I give doctors that same credit. They may indeed have a specific area of practice, but even that makes them 2nd level tech support for that area and 1st level...maybe...for everything else.

That's who we are asking all these medical questions of, and they probably have most of their answers provided by the same place you'd find them - Google.

The only value I place in physical exams is not the doctor's appraisal of the results, but the the process of obtaining test results themselves. I know from Google what good ranges are for the various stuff general practitioners examine, so I get the results, blank out while they explain stuff, then take the results and go on Google to get a clearer understanding. Honestly, if there was a way to simply send my various fluids to Google and get values/readings, and just WebMD all of it, I'd never see a doctor again until a repair was required. I don't fault doctors for this, I simply respect how trivial 1st and 2nd level tech support is.

I don't think the average doctor cares much one way or the other if this disease or that gets cured. They went to a crapload of school, racked up craploads of debt, and now work craploads of hours to pay that back and maybe have a better than average shot at the good life in their 50s-60s. They see patients, do their level best to do right by each one, punch the time clock, go home to the family, lather rinse repeat for the next 30-40 years...just like the rest of us. I am not knocking them at all, I just figure they are like any other profession, running the same kind of rat race without all the nobility and deity-like power we seek to imbue them with.



This is very true. After spending 25% of your life and hundreds of thousands of dollars .... most are not going to rock the boat. They do the JOB like other people who have JOBS.

Because at the end of the day? It's a JOB.
 
Old 10-14-2019, 03:17 PM
 
Location: Somewhere gray and damp, close to the West Coast
20,955 posts, read 5,546,892 times
Reputation: 8559
Quote:
Originally Posted by genesiss23 View Post
Are you sure that is the true reason why that occurred? It's very rare for a license to be lost. More commonly they will require extra education in the deficit area. The most common reason to lose a license is to be caught multiple times using improperly addicting drugs.

Go online and look up the actual board order to see the true reason. Diet does have its place in therapy but if you swear by diet alone and nothing else, that can be malpractice.

Not following "standard of care", which translates to not prescribing enough drugs and procedures, even though her patients routinely got better on diet and more traditional remedies. She encouraged her patients to eat organic diets free of wheat and light on red meat.


Also, political activism in the district she lived and practiced in.


These are the reasons she was ruined professionally. I have no reason to doubt the veracity of her account.
 
Old 10-14-2019, 03:19 PM
 
Location: Southern California
29,266 posts, read 16,760,060 times
Reputation: 18909
Many smart, wise voices on this thread...good brains and common sense.
 
Old 10-14-2019, 03:23 PM
 
13,962 posts, read 5,628,343 times
Reputation: 8619
Quote:
Originally Posted by vkhmini View Post
Not following "standard of care", which translates to not prescribing enough drugs
I totally buy this as a cause for censure or even yanking the license. It is big business with heavy government involvement, the prescribing of drugs for every this, that and something else. Doctors who eschew that business model and do so with any sort of voice would be pariahs within their profession because that is a fat apple cart that money just rains from, and upsetting that cart would be seriously bad juju.

I don't doubt the veracity of the story either, because people getting wrecked for going against status quos, especially ones that involve government and money changing hands...yeah, that is all too common.
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtovenice View Post
[/b]

This is very true. After spending 25% of your life and hundreds of thousands of dollars .... most are not going to rock the boat. They do the JOB like other people who have JOBS.

Because at the end of the day? It's a JOB.
And there is nothing wrong with being that way. FFS, I am that way, because common sense dictates certain realities, and paying my bills is a reality I am good with.

Just saying that we needn't deify these folks and realize they are workers in an often thankless gig. They don't know everything, they are not omnipotent or omniscient, and they aren't community servants who wake up devoted to our every need. They are workers, doing a gig, getting paid, hoping to retire to a beach and some slushy drinks. Just ordinary people who attended a crapton of school. Respect them, yes, but respect that they weren't touched by G-d, they simply read the books they were assigned in school. I salute the achievement, but no the point of anointing them demigods.
 
Old 10-14-2019, 03:24 PM
 
Location: Somewhere gray and damp, close to the West Coast
20,955 posts, read 5,546,892 times
Reputation: 8559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Volobjectitarian View Post
I totally buy this as a cause for censure or even yanking the license. It is big business with heavy government involvement, the prescribing of drugs for every this, that and something else. Doctors who eschew that business model and do so with any sort of voice would be pariahs within their profession because that is a fat apple cart that money just rains from, and upsetting that cart would be seriously bad juju.

I don't doubt the veracity of the story either, because people getting wrecked for going against status quos, especially ones that involve government and money changing hands...yeah, that is all too common.

Amen.
 
Old 10-14-2019, 03:31 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,779,853 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by vkhmini View Post
Not following "standard of care", which translates to not prescribing enough drugs and procedures, even though her patients routinely got better on diet and more traditional remedies. She encouraged her patients to eat organic diets free of wheat and light on red meat.


Also, political activism in the district she lived and practiced in.


These are the reasons she was ruined professionally. I have no reason to doubt the veracity of her account.
I see you did not look at my link. "Standard of care" for hypertension includes lifestyle adjustments. She's being disingenuous.
 
Old 10-14-2019, 03:32 PM
 
Location: Somewhere gray and damp, close to the West Coast
20,955 posts, read 5,546,892 times
Reputation: 8559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katarina Witt View Post
I see you did not look at my link. "Standard of care" for hypertension includes lifestyle adjustments. She's being disingenuous.

If you say so.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top