Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-29-2015, 10:44 AM
 
14,247 posts, read 17,921,045 times
Reputation: 13807

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
TRESPASS - (Law) To commit an unlawful injury to the person, property, or rights of another, with actual or implied force or violence, especially to enter onto another's land wrongfully.

If you enter upon another's land wrongfully, that is a trespass. A felony.
In my state (Arizona), trespass and burglary are two different things. Trespass is a misdemeanor and not a felony (1st degree trespass can be a class 6 felony in certain specific cases) and burglary in the third degree is also a misdemeanor. You are not justified in using deadly force in the event of trespass and, if you do, you will be prosecuted. You can only claim justification in the event of burglary in the first or second degree, not in the event of burglary in the third degree. And, as I tried to point out in my previous post, even if you do claim justification you are still potentially in a legal minefield.

Last edited by Jaggy001; 04-29-2015 at 10:55 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-29-2015, 10:48 AM
 
1,834 posts, read 2,695,348 times
Reputation: 2675
No do not prosecute. A burglar or a home invasion often starts out as a simple action but as the burglar starts into the process the home owner is in physical danger and must assume the worse even as the burglar may seek to control his own emotions. There is often only seconds for the home owner to act and we as a society must support and encourage his efforts to protect himself, his family and his home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2015, 11:05 AM
 
14,247 posts, read 17,921,045 times
Reputation: 13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickMan7 View Post
Umm, the "illegal intent" was breaking into my home in the first place. I'm not sure where you live that it's legal to enter someone's home without their permission. Remind me never to move there.
Generally, the difference between Trespass and Burglary is "intent to commit any theft or any felony". And that is where, legally, it gets tricky. In law, you have to 'reasonably believe' that the perp had that intent. But will a jury agree with your definition of 'reasonable'? And a defense of justification doesn't work for Trespass.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2015, 11:10 AM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,216,625 times
Reputation: 29354
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam Bomb View Post
A long time ago a country Sheriff told me to do whatever I had to do to protect myself. Anything. Then drag the criminal outside and call the law.
Sounds like good advice.
Horrible advice. Inside, you'll likely not be charged. Outside, you'll likely be convicted. Maybe you got it backwards. If you shoot someone outside, drag them inside then call the police.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2015, 11:14 AM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,216,625 times
Reputation: 29354
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pennies4Penny View Post
This is not a black or white, yes or no situation. And we shouldn't continue to let people get away with murder under the guise of self-protection. You should have to PROVE you were in actual danger, that your life was truly threatened.
How do you prove that? There is probably not going to be third party witnesses or video footage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2015, 11:19 AM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,216,625 times
Reputation: 29354
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pennies4Penny View Post
It's not usually what happens. A theif is just after materialistic things they can either sell for money or keep cause they can't buy it themselves. Most theives are not looking to hurt a person. They want to get their product and get out. This is why most home invasions happen during the day, when people are at work or out. This crime does not warrant death. Yes, I've been robbed before. It sucks, but I did not wish death to my intruder. I wished him a lifetime of bad karma, but not death.
Usually. Most. Unfortunately, victims of home invasion do not have time to conduct an interview to determine what kind of intruder he is facing. One mistake and if you're wrong, it could cost you your life.

Most criminals might prefer to get the goods and get out but theys also don't want to be seen doing it. Some might decide to eliminate any witnesses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2015, 11:50 AM
 
78,409 posts, read 60,579,949 times
Reputation: 49689
Quote:
Originally Posted by kell490 View Post
A co worker of mine said his neighbor shot and killed someone that came into his home while he was sleeping tried to rob him. The burglar came in during the day thought his neighbor was at work. The burglar wasn't armed the local DA isn't going to press charges. I don't think they would get a conviction anyway in my state of Arizona. If someone comes into a home to do wrong to me he knows the risk of getting killed. A few years ago 2 men entered a home tied up a retired doctor and his wife killed both of them burned their body's in a backyard. I think I would do the same and shoot the person in my home because if they get control over you end up like those old people. Have no idea what they are going to do I don't want to risk my family. Some of my co-workers have said the homeowner should have been prosecuted.
Seeing as how you don't know they are armed or not.....tough luck for the robber when the homeowner doesn't wait to find out.

Now, they can't see someone walking across their yard at night and come out guns blazing...but once you've entered someones house then all bets are off.

In general though, we don't have enough facts to come to a full decision.

Your co-workers that think the guy should be charged? Ask them how they'd feel if the shooter was a woman instead and the intruder and unarmed career rapist?

P.S. Intruders are only unarmed until they enter the kitchen or pick up a poker from the fireplace etc. lotsa true-crime shows the murder wheapon was something already in the house.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2015, 12:04 PM
 
Location: I'm around here someplace :)
3,633 posts, read 5,355,886 times
Reputation: 3980
Quote:
Originally Posted by kell490 View Post
A co worker of mine said his neighbor shot and killed someone that came into his home while he was sleeping tried to rob him. The burglar came in during the day thought his neighbor was at work. The burglar wasn't armed the local DA isn't going to press charges. I don't think they would get a conviction anyway in my state of Arizona. If someone comes into a home to do wrong to me he knows the risk of getting killed. A few years ago 2 men entered a home tied up a retired doctor and his wife killed both of them burned their body's in a backyard. I think I would do the same and shoot the person in my home because if they get control over you end up like those old people. Have no idea what they are going to do I don't want to risk my family. Some of my co-workers have said the homeowner should have been prosecuted.
I think every state has its own laws, and I wouldn't know where your state stands on it, but I believe a person has the right to protect his/her home/family/property. Besides, if someone breaks into your home, you don't know if they're armed or not. I mean a person can't exactly approach an intruder and politely ask "Excuse me, Mister, but are you carrying a gun, knife, etc.?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2015, 12:07 PM
 
14,247 posts, read 17,921,045 times
Reputation: 13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
Seeing as how you don't know they are armed or not.....tough luck for the robber when the homeowner doesn't wait to find out.

Now, they can't see someone walking across their yard at night and come out guns blazing...but once you've entered someones house then all bets are off.

In general though, we don't have enough facts to come to a full decision.

Your co-workers that think the guy should be charged? Ask them how they'd feel if the shooter was a woman instead and the intruder and unarmed career rapist?

P.S. Intruders are only unarmed until they enter the kitchen or pick up a poker from the fireplace etc. lotsa true-crime shows the murder wheapon was something already in the house.
Under Arizona law (this incident happened in AZ) it doesn't matter whether they are armed (1st degree burglary) or not (2nd degree burglary). Provided you can get the DA or a jury to agree that you had grounds to 'reasonably believe' that deadly force was necessary then you are in the clear.

Format Document
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2015, 12:13 PM
 
Location: Rural Wisconsin
19,803 posts, read 9,357,559 times
Reputation: 38343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pennies4Penny View Post
I think they should be prosecuted. Unless the intruder was trying to physically harm the home owner and put them in danger, there is no need to shoot someone. People shoot too quickly these days and they always shoot to kill. No one should die for trying to steal a TV or jewelry or whatever. Go to jail, yes, but killed no.
I am so tired of hearing the argument that theft does not warrant the taking of human life.

If you don't want to risk losing your life, then don't steal and don't break the law. It IS that simple.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top