Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That's your paranoia coming out, nobody is hating on you, you are just a sensitive little feller It was used as an abbreviation of Homosexual but you just keep on playing the victim maybe some 10 year old's will buy it and feel sorry for you since it is something on their level. Good grief.
I couldn't care less if you call me Homo since I am a Heterosexual it is a meaningless term to me.
Calling a Homosexual a HOMO, depending on context,can be equated with calling a Black a NI&&er, that is the thing you can't seem to grasp.
Absolutely not ... and why would you even think you needed to ask such a stupid question? Have I not been pretty clear so far about my thoughts on adults having sex with children? I think i have been VERY CLEAR.
Actually, no, you haven't. You've pretty much said you are FOR it. Read on:
1. Homosexuals actually raise children better on average than heterosexual parents, according to studies.
2. You're painting homosexuals as pedophiles.
That only leaves one conclusion: You think pedophilia is the way to go when raising children. And that's sick!
At any rate, quit dodging the following already.
Quote:
Originally Posted by raison_d'etre
Did you know that most pedophiles in the USA are also Christian? So that must mean that all christians are pedophiles....that is a terrifying concept. Just look at all those priests who molest children...
Religion: 88% grew up in a Christian household and 72% still considered themselves Christian
I challenge you to quote any of the studies I directed you to, where it says having sex with children is good for them. Lying is a sin in the bible, you do know that, right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic 2.0
And the studies aren't making claims; they're showing inarguable results. And you are the best proof that they're inarguable, because you (motivated as you are by your weak, opinion-based agenda) can't manage to present one shred of evidence to counter their findings.
Depending on CONTEXT, Homo can be a derogatory term, THAT is the form it has been used in this thread.
Your so funny (funny ha ha .. just to be clear so you don't get all offended by assuming I meant funny weird) .... you're now "Karnack the Magnificent", able to read minds ... over the internet even! Bravo!
Even though "homo" was clearly used as an abbreviation for homosexual in that instance .... you stuck that liberal slur card on your forehead and BAM ! The spirits told you that it's secret meaning was derogatory!
I couldn't care less if you call me Homo since I am a Heterosexual it is a meaningless term to me.
Calling a Homosexual a HOMO, depending on context,can be equated with calling a Black a NI&&er, that is the thing you can't seem to grasp.
Only because your paranoid and why do you feel you need to announce your Hetro? kinda hypocritical of you are you afraid someone may mistake you as a Homosexual? kinda childish don't you think
(to Trackwatch)...and why do you feel you need to announce your Hetro? kinda hypocritical of you are you afraid someone may mistake you as a Homosexual?
You must be digging through the bottom of your "Things I can say to avoid the actual debate" barrel...
The father and daughter were reunited when she was only 13 years old. This is when their sexual relationship began.
He claims he did not view her as his daughter, but as someone he loves. He has also stated, “I would not have sex with her if she had not seduced me.”
I don’t know if anyone believes this BS he’s spewing, but I sure as hell don’t. Even if I could believe a 13 year old was responsible for seducing a grown man, which I don’t, he should have had the common sense to understand that she’s still only 13! Oh yes, and his daughter!!!
Even though he is trying to pass himself off as a victim, his actions show otherwise. His daughter has become pregnant on two separate occasions.
Both times after giving birth he would threaten her life as well as her mothers. He frightened this poor child into throwing her own children down the air shaft of their 3-story apartment. These do not sound like the actions of a “victim”.
What sickens me the most about this man is not just the fact that he has knocked up his daughter multiple times, but that he forced her to dispose of the newborns. Because of this prosecutors have pursued her.
Because of him, she is now facing up to 7 years in prison. She will receive her sentence on May 10th.
Gonna be hard for them to pretend they didn't see your post, PITTSTON2SARASOTA. Why can't you give the poor saps a chance?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It was used as an abbreviation of Homosexual but you just keep on playing the victim maybe some 10 year old's will buy it and feel sorry for you since it is something on their level. Good grief.
