Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why wouldn't it be relevant? I agree that it doesn't mean he deserved what happened, but it can also show that Zimmerman had every right to defend himself against somebody who could be seen as dangerous. If they show that he was prone to getting in fights, I would think that it would be relevant to this case.
Zimmerman was prone to getting into fights---he had a domestic violence restraining order against him at one point, and had assaulted a police officer and resisted arrest (charges dropped if he completed anger management classes.)
Those facts are not allowed into the trial, so why would any evidence of a propensity for fighting in Trayvon's past if it even existed, be allowed? And there is no evidence of that anyway.
Zimmerman was prone to getting into fights---he had a domestic violence restraining order against him at one point, and had assaulted a police officer and resisted arrest (charges dropped if he completed anger management classes.)
Those facts are not allowed into the trial, so why would any evidence of a propensity for fighting in Trayvon's past if it even existed, be allowed? And there is no evidence of that anyway.
Well, you are glad his MMA past isn't brought in. How biased is that. You want to win to such a degree, you don't care if an innocent man is taken down. Pitiful!
Serino saying his impression is that GZ didn't recognize his voice because that is typical of someone hearing themselves. He didn't take that as a denial.
There's so much stupid conjecture that they ask of the witnesses.
Why aren't they relying on actual documentation, like the pages of statements by the first investigator, and later Serino, in which they documented why there was probable cause to charge Zimmerman with manslaughter? I haven't seen any of that introduced into evidence.
Of course I remember. I, unlike others, am actually watching.
The Olympics Committee could find NO record of her qualifying. NONE!
Guess that one flew right over your head.
And please stop with the personal challenges. It's sickening and very old.
Do you have any link, or any other form of proof, that the Olympics Committee made a statement that they could find no record of her qualifying? Btw, I'm, like everybody else, responding to people posting on a public Internet political forum.
Zimmerman was prone to getting into fights---he had a domestic violence restraining order against him at one point, and had assaulted a police officer and resisted arrest (charges dropped if he completed anger management classes.)
Those facts are not allowed into the trial, so why would any evidence of a propensity for fighting in Trayvon's past if it even existed, be allowed? And there is no evidence of that anyway.
Both of their characters should be under the microscope here so that the jury can make a more informed opinion.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
