Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
these regions of new European Seatlements meaning southern cone , Australia, Canada, the USA (never) had big populations of natives or aboriginals , and the ones who were not murdered and wiped out mixed with the Europeans .
What on Earth are you talking about? The Mapuche tribe is one of the most populous Native tribes in existence today, one of only two tribes in Latin America to completely resist European conquest and the city of Santiago is built upon Incan ruins, Quillota in Valparaiso was the foremost settlement of the Inca empire in Chile not to mention the smaller pockets of Aymaras in the north.
You're delirious. Chile is the epitome of a Mestizo nation yet its still the most developed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Untasted
(A tri-racial country citizen trying to whiten up his/her country).
LMAO, I have shown several cultural regions of Colombia from English Caribbean speaking Raizales to the Pastusos, the arch enemy of the Inca empire to the north, who stopped the Inca in their conquest north, something the central Chilean tribes were unable to do.
The only one trying to whiten a Mestizo society is you because you're so entrenched in your simple belief system. Sorry but the facts don't lie, Archaeology doesn't lie and Science doesn't lie.
we also said already that the main European settlements in the Hispanic America during Colonial times weren't located at the Southern Cone, but in what today is the DR, Cuba, Peru, Mexico, Colombia, Ecuador, Panama etc. And the main settlements in Brazil were Rio, Salvador, Recife and Olinda (Dutch colonization), Ouro Preto etc, far from what today is South Brazil.
we also said already that the main European settlements in the Hispanic America during Colonial times weren't located at the Southern Cone, but in what today is the DR, Cuba, Peru, Mexico, Colombia, Ecuador, Panama etc. And the main settlements in Brazil were Rio, Salvador, Recife and Olinda (Dutch colonization), Ouro Preto etc, far from what today is South Brazil.
Yes youre right (during the colonial times ). What happened next ?, Oh southern cone got the largest wave of European migration. , That's what happened
Yes youre right (during the colonial times ). What happened next ?, Oh southern cone got the largest wave of European migration. , That's what happened
Argentina followed by Uruguay, southern Brazil and Venezuela got the largest wave of European migration. Chile comes in way after that.
Venezuela too like Colombia is mostly Multiracial (or "tri-racial)
Yet again, simple minds = simple arguments. Chile is multi-racial by definition, that is what Mestizo means.
You can tell in many of their spiky hair and high cheek bones even some Venezuelan Mulatos or tri-racial people have more Caucasoid features.
The point is Chile is Mestizo like much of Latin America, that sets it apart from the theorem you are mentally chained to.
We can put all this to rest. "Race" has nothing to do with prosperity or government efficiency. Ya. Listo.
Exactly. Untasted is desperate to prove otherwise but he's failed miserably. Panama is black and richer than Incan Chile. Dominican Republic is black and it's already richer than Argentina.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
