Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Trump won in 2016 because he won several close swing states. He lost in 2020 because he lost several swing states. He lost the popular vote both times which was depicted in the polls.
Polls do mean something especially local ones here that are not some left wing biased polling group.
But you just want to say "Polls is bad" be my guest.
Trump won 30 states in 2016 and 25 states in 2020. Local polls are the only important polls since the national popular vote is based on the 1 sided California and is meaningless.
The same states Trump barely lost in 2020, the local polls today showing him winning in 2024.
Trump won in 2016 because he won several close swing states. He lost in 2020 because he lost several swing states. He lost the popular vote both times which was depicted in the polls.
Polls do mean something especially local ones here that are not some left wing biased polling group.
But you just want to say "Polls is bad" be my guest.
Polls had because Trump losing…and when it didn’t happen, Dems have been furious about it ever since.
They mean something, even moreso when it fits one’s narrative.
Trump won 30 states in 2016 and 25 states in 2020. Local polls are the only important polls since the national popular vote is based on the 1 sided California and is meaningless.
The same states Trump barely lost in 2020, the local polls today showing him winning in 2024.
You are correct. If you go back and look at the polling done state by state in 2016 there was not enough polling done in many states right before the election. And there were events that happened regarding the HRC investigation with Weiners laptop that might have helped Trump those final days. 1 or 2% was enough for him. The dems never should have nominated a candidate with an ongoing criminal investigation.
Quite the assumption. Folks simply aren’t in favor of skyrocketing violent crime, border crisis, skyrocketing Bidenflation, etc…, and let’s not forget war due to Sleepy Joe being unable to keep the peace with foreign leaders and Putin attacking for a second time while he’s in office. Perhaps he can buy more oil off of him that’ll help fund his war
Please explain how Fetterman will resolve any of those situations, if you can, which I doubt.
Please explain how Fetterman will resolve any of those situations, if you can, which I doubt.
Fetterman won’t resolve any of those. He’s a dullard that isn’t even healthy enough to debate. He’ll likely contribute to more of Sleepy Joes debacles, as he’s a freeloader, defends and enables criminals, can’t even fix his own neighborhoods, etc…
Fetterman won’t resolve any of those. He’s a dullard that isn’t even healthy enough to debate. He’ll likely contribute to more of Sleepy Joes debacles, as he’s a freeloader, defends and enables criminals, can’t even fix his own neighborhoods, etc…
Bringing them up is a great reason not to vote for him.
I am on topic. You just don’t like it because the truth is unpopular. We don’t need more of the Dem debacles we’ve experienced the last 18 months.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
