Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-10-2012, 01:25 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,954,445 times
Reputation: 5661

Advertisements

I think Amanda Marcotte gets it right:

Quote:
After two solid weeks of Republicans rapidly escalating attacks on contraception access under the banner of "religous freedom," Obama finally announced what the White House is proposing an accomodation of religiously affiliated employers who don't want to offer birth control coverage as part of their insurance plans. In those situations, the insurance companies will have to reach out directly to employees and offer contraception coverage for free, without going through the employer. Insurance companies are down with the plan, because as Matt Yglesias explained at Moneybox, contraception actually saves insurance companies money, since it's cheaper than abortion and far cheaper than childbirth. Because the insurance companies have to reach out to employees directly, there's very little danger of women not getting coverage because they are unaware they're eligible.

That's the nitty-gritty. The fun part of this is that Obama just pulled a fast one on Republicans. He drew this out for two weeks, letting Republicans work themselves into a frenzy of anti-contraception rhetoric, all thinly disguised as concern for religious liberty, and then created a compromise that addressed their purported concerns but without actually reducing women's access to contraception, which is what this has always been about. (As Dana Goldstein reported in 2010, before the religious liberty gambit was brought up, the Catholic bishops were just demanding that women be denied access and told to abstain from sex instead.) With the fig leaf of religious liberty removed, Republicans are in a bad situation. They can either drop this and slink away knowing they've been punked, or they can double down. But in order to do so, they'll have to be more blatantly anti-contraception, a politically toxic move in a country where 99% of women have used contraception.

My guess is that they'll take their knocks and go home, but a lot of the damage has already been done. Romney was provoked repeatedly to go on the record saying negative things about contraception. Sure, it was in the frame of concern about religious liberty, but as this incident fades into memory, what most people will remember is that Republicans picked a fight with Obama over contraception coverage and lost. This also gave Obama a chance to highlight this benefit and take full credit for it. Obama needs young female voters to turn out at the polls in November, and hijacking two weeks of the news cycle to send the message that he's going to get you your birth control for free is a big win for him in that department. I expect to see some ads in the fall showing Romney saying hostile things about contraception and health care reform, with the message that free birth control is going away if he's elected. It's all so perfect that I'm inclined to think this was Obama's plan all along.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-10-2012, 01:31 PM
 
3,939 posts, read 8,975,486 times
Reputation: 1516
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rggr View Post
How is it a war on human rights to say "I don't want to buy you something?" There are community clinics all over the place where people can go get free contraceptives, or they can spend a couple of dollars at the Circle K. It's not like the Catholic Church is the only possible contraceptive outlet.
Insurance subsidizes contraceptives for most free Americans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2012, 01:33 PM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,588,653 times
Reputation: 2823
Quote:
Originally Posted by kayfouroh View Post
Insurance subsidizes contraceptives for most free Americans.
Then it shouldn't be that difficult for people to find a plan that meets their needs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2012, 01:37 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,954,445 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rggr View Post
Then it shouldn't be that difficult for people to find a plan that meets their needs.
It's all over, Obama punked the GOP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2012, 01:40 PM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,588,653 times
Reputation: 2823
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
It's all over, Obama punked the GOP.
The republicans were standing up for the church. If the church is satisfied with the agreement, then the republicans' goal was met as was Obama's. Calling that "punked" is a good example of what's wrong in modern politics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2012, 01:42 PM
 
Location: California
37,135 posts, read 42,228,838 times
Reputation: 35019
I'm happy it's between insurance companies and employees and leaving the employer out...that could lead to other good things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2012, 01:44 PM
 
3,939 posts, read 8,975,486 times
Reputation: 1516
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rggr View Post
Then it shouldn't be that difficult for people to find a plan that meets their needs.
... have you tried shopping for insurance without employer subsidy lately?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2012, 01:47 PM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,588,653 times
Reputation: 2823
Quote:
Originally Posted by kayfouroh View Post
... have you tried shopping for insurance without employer subsidy lately?
Yes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2012, 01:53 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,678,403 times
Reputation: 7943
Very wise move. I'm glad the Obama administration didn't dig their heels in on this issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2012, 01:55 PM
 
3,939 posts, read 8,975,486 times
Reputation: 1516
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rggr View Post
Yes.
You must make WAY more than the average person, because I just looked and on my family's moderate income, we wouldn't be able to swing 2k/month for private insurance, where we pay ~800/mo for similar coverage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:19 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top