Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
He didn’t say that but implied it. The word choice is disgusting to describe a monster who was blowing up people and children. I was being sarcastic. I think the worst are “outcry” “very challenging” and “young man” to describe a 24 year old piece of human scum. his words:
“He does not at all mention anything about terrorism, nor does he mention anything about hate," Manley said. "But, instead, it is the outcry of a very challenged young man talking about challenges in his personal life that led him to this point."
Anyone else wonder? A very challenged life and HE BLOWS PEOPLE UP?!
Options would have included talking with friends family, professionals, or church professionals stealing starting fights all possibilities... But no! instead of going with any option he begins building bombs!!?
He didn’t say that but implied it. The word choice is disgusting to describe a monster who was blowing up people and children. I was being sarcastic. I think the worst are “outcry” “very challenging” and “young man” to describe a 24 year old piece of human scum. his words:
“He does not at all mention anything about terrorism, nor does he mention anything about hate," Manley said. "But, instead, it is the outcry of a very challenged young man talking about challenges in his personal life that led him to this point."
IF the media and the police and the justice system showed 1% of this empathy towards criminals of the non-white persuasion, I actually wouldn't be angry about their word choice.
But the fact of the matter is only white criminals are given the benefit of the doubt while non-white criminals are summarily judged as monsters or animals.
The only ones who get it easier than white male criminals are white female criminals.
IF the media and the police and the justice system showed 1% of this empathy towards criminals of the non-white persuasion, I actually wouldn't be angry about their word choice.
But the fact of the matter is only white criminals are given the benefit of the doubt while non-white criminals are summarily judged as monsters or animals.
The only ones who get it easier than white male criminals are white female criminals.
That is some impressive virtue signaling. Your goodness is now apparent to all but the most deplorable.
Because that is what many of the other highly developed countries do, and they are now winning. The USA? It's declining, and with Trump's ignorant trade policies, will decline even faster. Those countries that celebrate and invest in higher education, including intensive apprenticeship programs for the trades, are thriving.
But in the USA? Public policy discussions involve guns and religion.
How backward.
I was replying to one of your liberal friends who implied home-schooled kids were nothing but a bunch of slack-jawed idiots because they didn't get a proper public school indoctrination. He also said "graduating from college did not make one smart..." If graduating from college doesn't make you smart, like he implied, why the h-ll all the fuss from liberals about giving them a dose of college indoctrination for free?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuca Racha
He didn’t say that but implied it. The word choice is disgusting to describe a monster who was blowing up people and children. I was being sarcastic. I think the worst are “outcry” “very challenging” and “young man” to describe a 24 year old piece of human scum. his words:
“He does not at all mention anything about terrorism, nor does he mention anything about hate," Manley said. "But, instead, it is the outcry of a very challenged young man talking about challenges in his personal life that led him to this point."
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magritte25
IF the media and the police and the justice system showed 1% of this empathy towards criminals of the non-white persuasion, I actually wouldn't be angry about their word choice.
But the fact of the matter is only white criminals are given the benefit of the doubt while non-white criminals are summarily judged as monsters or animals.
The only ones who get it easier than white male criminals are white female criminals.
You and I must live in a different America.
The one I live in the NAACP and ACLU won't even allow my local news stations to describe race of perpetrators of violent crime here (likely without a lawsuit from above-mentioned clown-outfits.)
I think youre probably right but why does a young man not reach out for help and instead spends weeks and months figuring out how to maim and kill.
I just cannot get there.
That's because you are sane, we don't think like the insane/chemically imbalanced/brain damaged/whatever do.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
