NYC woman makes an INTENTIONAL false police call on a black man. (identities, jobs)

[golgi1]

Originally Posted by Beliciano

Talk about deflecting. Let me guess, you are probably upset about the rioting and could care less about the man who was actually killed by the police!!

Deflecting how? Are you sure you are aware of the definition of that word?

I directly addressed the logic of the quote to which I was responding. I then ascribed motivation to it, because I dismantled the claimed logic that she was hoping to see him beaten by stating his race on the phone.

And ironically aligning with your "deflecting" accusation, you proceed to change the topic to Minneapolis. Again, it seems that you might not know what "deflecting" means.

[moneill]

Originally Posted by golgi1

Pulled what before? Having a panic reaction to a hostile stranger?

Nope. She had a relationship spat, and there are two sides to that. And ex partners get jilted. All of the implications are just that.

Is this going to turn into a routine of false logic that is easily refuted? How low IQ do we have to go?

Does your lack of ability to identify a true parallel between the situations play into your lack of judgement in regard to what happened at the park?

PANIC --panic would have been to put the leash on the dog and leave.

You are trollilng people.

You know she wasn't panicked, -- she calmly laid out her plan to call and then acted out her role on the phone...that's not panic...that's calculated insanity.

[Three Wolves In Snow]

Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry

Are you one of those people who gets into an argument with a dog owner, makes a veiled threat and then tries to lure that dog over? That's who you are? That's how you were raised?

The lady was off but no doubt that guy is acting like a scumbag too.

Oh, no, my threats were not "veiled", they were very real. "If your dog comes up to my dog, your dog is going to get hurt."

Because that is exactly what would happen. My dog was scared of other dogs. If they were not controlled by their owner, and they came up to my dog, my dog was going to fight them out of fear. I never went to a place that allowed dogs off leash, legally, with my boy dog...because I knew that.

Other people not following the rules doesn't release them from their own stupidity and violating the rules. My dog I can control, but I cannot control their dog that they, also, could not control.

My duty was to protect my dog. If another dog came barrelling up to him - that's not on me, it's not on my dog. My dog was ALWAYS on leash. I don't give a single sht what the other dog owner thought they should "be able to do" in an area that required dogs to be on leash.

[tamajane]

Originally Posted by golgi1

yeah, they're the monsters as evidenced by the fact that its the Karens who fill the prisons.

They only don't commit crimes because they are so privileged.

[jacqueg]

Originally Posted by golgi1

Pulled what before? Having a panic reaction to a hostile stranger?

Nope. She had a relationship spat, and there are two sides to that. And ex partners get jilted. All of the implications are just that.

Is this going to turn into a routine of false logic that is easily refuted? How low IQ do we have to go?

Does your lack of ability to identify a true parallel between the situations play into your lack of judgement in regard to what happened at the park?

No. Making up damaging stories about a man because she thinks she can get away with it.

I will say that she's apparently not a racist.

[Pilot1]

Originally Posted by moneill

PANIC --panic would have been to put the leash on the dog and leave.

You are trollilng people.

You know she wasn't panicked, -- she calmly laid out her plan to call and then acted out her role on the phone...that's not panic...that's calculated insanity.

I can't believe I'm agreeing with you!

[golgi1]

Originally Posted by moneill

PANIC --panic would have been to put the leash on the dog and leave.

You are trollilng people.

You know she wasn't panicked, -- she calmly laid out her plan to call and then acted out her role on the phone...that's not panic...that's calculated insanity.

I know precisely that she was panicked. As I prior stated. Don't put words in my mouth that are inverse from what I have repeatedly stated. You can surely come up with a better argument method.

Again, I know precisely that she was panicked.

I analyze certain aspects of her behavior for a living. That's a true story.

She has physiological signs of a panic reaction that are beyond her control.

This entire situation is one large troll. Though, I know that you dislike that I'm dissecting it and pointing that out.

She was clearly being harassed and threatened by a much larger person. She didn't ask for the interaction.

If the situation were racially inverse, the man would be crucified in the press.

The panic is clear in her voice. She can't catch her breath enough to properly voice her words. That's a classic adrenaline dump / panic reaction. If you've ever experienced it, the signs are obvious.

She probably should have left, but that's the nature of panic.

One always isn't aware of what they are doing beyond focusing on the threatening party. That's what the adrenaline dump does. Hence the way she was pulling on her dog while maintaining strict eye contact with the threat.

It may not have been smart to turn her back on her much larger harasser in an isolated part of the park. You can't make that judgement call. Only she would be able to, having been there.

Warning a threat of action is standard procedure to try to warn them off. It means nothing else. There was nothing cool and calculated about that call. She's obviously extremely panicked while making it.

Remember that video recordings work both ways.

This is memorialized forever, and people will forever be able to witness her obvious state of panic and then the Black support for her harasser and the twisted media reaction. Its basically a giant memorial to the innate immorality and win-at-any-cost propaganda tactics of, unfortunately, the political Black machine in 2020 as well as the greater Left. It assures that justice will eventually come full circle.

We can argue about it now, and you and others can promote their lies about that situation without any true check or balance, but AI is already to the point that it can make highly objective decisions about the mental state of humans based on their behaviors and detected diagnostics (like her breath rate through the microphone).

So enjoy the triumph of lies now. Soon enough the self-interested assertions of them won't be nearly enough.

[golgi1]

Originally Posted by jacqueg

No. Making up damaging stories about a man because she thinks she can get away with it.

I will say that she's apparently not a racist.

That they were lies is an assertion by a jilted partner, not a fact. A lovers spat isn't a parallel situation. Their situation obviously deteriorated to the point that he is no where near a reliable character witness.

Her harasser documented his harassing / threatening statements to her and the rest is on video. This is not a judgement call about her honesty. The facts are in the public sphere.

This comes down to pure spin of the obvious facts by the left and the Black political machine.

Even claims about her so called "calculation" (implying deception) as she was calling the cops are obviously ridiculous to anyone who watches the video and is objective whatsoever. She can barely catch her breath from fear and is highly agitated.

None of this would have happened if the antisocial psycho didn't harass her and try to call her dog against her wishes. Those facts are not going away, nor will they fade into the background. They are primary context.

[r small]

Originally Posted by golgi1

That they were lies is an assertion by a jilted partner, not a fact. A lovers spat isn't a parallel situation. Their situation obviously deteriorated to the point that he is no where near a reliable character witness.

Her harasser documented his harassing / threatening statements to her and the rest is on video. This is not a judgement call about her honesty. The facts are in the public sphere.

This comes down to pure spin of the obvious facts by the left and the Black political machine.

Even claims about her so called "calculation" (implying deception) as she was calling the cops are obviously ridiculous to anyone who watches the video and is objective whatsoever. She can barely catch her breath from fear and is highly agitated.

None of this would have happened if the antisocial psycho didn't harass her and try to call her dog against her wishes. Those facts are not going away, nor will they fade into the background. They are primary context.

None of this would have happened if she had kept her dog on a leash as is required in that part of the park.

[golgi1]

Originally Posted by tamajane

They only don't commit crimes because they are so privileged.

LOL. Can't tell if serious.