Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-25-2022, 04:57 PM
 
12,595 posts, read 6,651,631 times
Reputation: 1350

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by L8Gr8Apost8 View Post
I thought we did that with the moral thread. Many of us clearly demonstrated where we got our morals from.
Right. Moral codes based upon intuition and preference, and societal consensus of what most thought was cool.
The Religious have the most epic and prolific writings in human history as a basis...and they defer to them.
No comparison...the basis the Religious use is something that has endured time, and holds great respect...reverence, even.
Others, basically have nothing but their opinion and desires.
As you know...I view it as 99% subjective. But I still must give props to the Religious for having something so historically meritorious and enduring as a basis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-25-2022, 05:04 PM
 
Location: minnesota
15,862 posts, read 6,325,302 times
Reputation: 5059
Quote:
Originally Posted by GldnRule View Post
Right. Moral codes based upon intuition and preference, and societal consensus of what most thought was cool.
The Religious have the most epic and prolific writings in human history as a basis...and they defer to them.
No comparison...the basis the Religious use is something that has endured time, and holds great respect...reverence, even.
Others, basically have nothing but their opinion and desires.
As you know...I view it as 99% subjective. But I still must give props to the Religious for having something so historically meritorious and enduring as a basis.
Dude, I literally showed you a moral code based on your own God and you STILL didn't understand. I'd tare you a new one but I know you like that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2022, 05:26 PM
 
12,595 posts, read 6,651,631 times
Reputation: 1350
Quote:
Originally Posted by L8Gr8Apost8 View Post
Dude, I literally showed you a moral code based on your own God and you STILL didn't understand. I'd tare you a new one but I know you like that.
Objective moral code?
I musta missed that...we usually debated back and forth about near universal subjectivity.
Hit me with it again...I wanna see it.
Heck...even as good as the Golden Rule is...it has subjective preference as a limitation...and may not always result in moral conduct.
One drunken wino sharing his bottle of MD20/20 with another drunken wino is following the Golden Rule.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2022, 08:14 PM
 
Location: Hickville USA
5,903 posts, read 3,795,328 times
Reputation: 28565
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
Another person who seems to believe that these are praise forums. I'm not a Civil War soldier, and despite being old I'm not old enough to have lived during the Civil War. But if that topic comes up in the history sub-forum, I'm likely to join the discussion since it is a topic that interests me.

Like you, I'm not clear why some religionists are so befuddled about this.
I've been a little baffled and befuddled lately myself by the a playground favorite saying "I know you are, but what am I?" mentality. Egads, you'd think I'd been gone for 15 years the way the weird has come out of the woodwork. LOL to the Civil War thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2022, 08:16 PM
 
Location: Hickville USA
5,903 posts, read 3,795,328 times
Reputation: 28565
Quote:
Originally Posted by LearnMe View Post
I decided to read that article about how atheists are the lowest of the low, and it reads more like another example of how religious thinking can be so dopey...

"There they are walking along the street, not hurting anything but not believing in God, and every time they pass a church they can feel people looking out the stained-glass window and thinking, “There goes another rapist.” "

Funny that a religious person posts this article as if it's an intelligent contribution to this discussion. Not only is it dopey, but it goes back to 2011 and offers no links to the studies referenced. So who knows about those studies, but apparently one is a survey of 105 undergraduate students. Based on this kind of nonsense, I suppose we're supposed to be convinced all religious people are this dopey? That's what the article seems to be suggesting.

I sure hope not...
LOL this is funny! And dopey....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2022, 08:18 PM
 
Location: Hickville USA
5,903 posts, read 3,795,328 times
Reputation: 28565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Diogenes View Post
Exactly, many religious people are disgusting, frightened bigots because of straw people posting on the internet.

And he stirs this hatred while supporting religious intolerance.
Yeah, I started to say something about his strawman arguments but I figured there was no point. It would incite the nastiness I'm afraid
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2022, 08:31 PM
 
Location: Hickville USA
5,903 posts, read 3,795,328 times
Reputation: 28565
I think he's a tro-tro-tro.....a resident under that bridge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2022, 08:40 PM
 
Location: In a Really Dark Place
629 posts, read 409,983 times
Reputation: 1668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr5150 View Post
Seems like a waste of time and electrons. Why post on a forum of which is devoted to a subject of which holds no relevance to one. I don’t knit or fly airplanes. I don’t visit knitting or airplane forums. So why all the none-spiritual people on this forum? Uncertain about one’s belief system? Perhaps.
Why do evangelists come knocking on my door Sunday mornings to proselytize?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2022, 12:03 AM
 
Location: Germany
16,779 posts, read 4,982,520 times
Reputation: 2113
Quote:
Originally Posted by GldnRule View Post
The bigotry, bias, and prejudice is toward those that get their moral directives and information about life and afterlife from the most epic and prolific books in human history...by those that work off of sources that don't have anywhere near that status.
I would not call it bigotry, but there are very good reasons our laws are not based on the OT, and that even most religious people do NOT get their morality from their religious books. The morality you are defending lead to 9/11.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GldnRule View Post
When the Atheists, or anyone else, can show that they have a more enduring, influential, or trusted basis for the beliefs/views they put forth....they may have a case to present.
1) Aristotle, et al.
2) Every good religious person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2022, 07:17 AM
 
12,595 posts, read 6,651,631 times
Reputation: 1350
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Diogenes View Post
I would not call it bigotry, but there are very good reasons our laws are not based on the OT, and that even most religious people do NOT get their morality from their religious books. The morality you are defending lead to 9/11.

1) Aristotle, et al.
2) Every good religious person.
9/11 was a counter-offensive military operation...in retaliation to being bombed and killed for years, BECAUSE of their Theologically based ways and culture that we didn't agree with.

Aristotle...yeah, his tutelage gave us, most notably, Alexander the Great.
Though I do think much of his philosophy is pretty cool...he placed arbitrary ​things like "courage" as a top moral value...and had not much more than a subjective "behave in the right manner" moral philosophy.
He proposed that we determine what is objectively "right" through habit and practice. By that...any behavior could be deemed "morally right" if that's what was the common "habit & practice" at the time.

Every Good Religious Person: Another completely subjective basis. What is "good" is subjective.
And, by applying Aristotle's philosophy...it's whatever was their "habit & practice".

You offer nothing objective...as usual.
Though it is objective fact that Aristotle determined that everything was sourced by some Being that is separate from it all. How did you like that concept?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top