Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-28-2022, 11:14 AM
 
Location: Jacksonville, FL
11,143 posts, read 10,707,417 times
Reputation: 9799

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbraybarten65 View Post
At some point, the horse and buggy become obsolete.

You think that's it's something else, because of course.
The horse and buggy became obsolete because there was no longer demand for horse and buggy after the automobile became more efficient, convenient, and economical. That is not the case with the trajectory of ICE vehicles. EVs are not as convenient or economical as ICE vehicles yet, and efficiency is also questionable. The reason the auto manufacturers have a transition plan is because previous legislation forced them to create one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-28-2022, 11:20 AM
 
Location: Midwest
9,411 posts, read 11,156,929 times
Reputation: 17889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kristinas_Cap View Post
Excellent news for China. So much market share in the battery mineral mining industry. Great news for any foreign supplier of fossil fuels that are needed to produce the batteries for electric vehicles. it’s going to be a windfall for them once the rest of the country gets on the bandwagon.
Indeed. China is building something like 30 new coal plants now. While the insane suicidal West shuts down generators and decides their best bet for power would be the very nation they formed NATO to defend against.
I don't know how you can get much crazier than that. But if things continue with the reality-challenged self-righteous loonies, China and Russia will be carving up the West by 2050 at the latest. It's been a good run. But when the inmates are running the asylum, we have a problem, Houston.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rjshae View Post
Well they can spend their $95 billion surplus on charging stations, I suppose.
Yeah, California has a budget "surplus" and I'm Christopher Columbus and I claim the New World for Andorra.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattja View Post
lol Newsom will be gone and we'll see how the California Air Resources Board's "rulings" hold up in court.
Not to mention when reality strikes. Being insane is apparently lots of fun.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2022, 11:25 AM
 
Location: A safe distance from San Francisco
12,350 posts, read 9,715,411 times
Reputation: 13892
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimRom View Post
The horse and buggy became obsolete because there was no longer demand for horse and buggy after the automobile became more efficient, convenient, and economical. That is not the case with the trajectory of ICE vehicles. EVs are not as convenient or economical as ICE vehicles yet, and efficiency is also questionable. The reason the auto manufacturers have a transition plan is because previous legislation forced them to create one.
The EV is the horse and buggy in this century's automotive debate.

EVs were considered - and rejected for many sound reasons - at the dawn of the automotive age. Nothing has changed....except for our population explosion of lemmings thirsting to be led by any lying moron down any disastrous path.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2022, 09:15 PM
 
1,212 posts, read 732,456 times
Reputation: 683
California gets waivers from the EPA for vehicle emissions laws:

https://www.epa.gov/state-and-local-...authorizations


Now a state might be able to set a maximum weight for non-commercial vehicles. But if the stated purpose is to reduce carbon-release, or to reduce electric-vehicle attributable carbon-release, or to reduce other air pollutants, then it might require an EPA waiver
.

Last edited by T Block; 08-28-2022 at 10:42 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2022, 07:56 AM
pdw
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
2,674 posts, read 3,092,968 times
Reputation: 1820
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownVic95 View Post
The EV is the horse and buggy in this century's automotive debate.

EVs were considered - and rejected for many sound reasons - at the dawn of the automotive age. Nothing has changed....except for our population explosion of lemmings thirsting to be led by any lying moron down any disastrous path.
Hybrids use less gas than ICE cars because it’s more efficient to run an electric motor off a battery being charged by an internal gasoline generator. Same principle applies with EVs, except you run off the electric grid. If the whole grid was running off oil and gas power plants you’d still use less oil powering the EVs than running the same number of ICE vehicles. Everyone is big on energy independence, the less domestic oil we waste, the less we need to buy from the Saudis. EVs are one of the ways we get there
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2022, 08:02 AM
 
29,446 posts, read 14,635,166 times
Reputation: 14423
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdw View Post
Hybrids use less gas than ICE cars because it’s more efficient to run an electric motor off a battery being charged by an internal gasoline generator. Same principle applies with EVs, except you run off the electric grid. If the whole grid was running off oil and gas power plants you’d still use less oil powering the EVs than running the same number of ICE vehicles. Everyone is big on energy independence, the less domestic oil we waste, the less we need to buy from the Saudis. EVs are one of the ways we get there
As far as technical and engineering aspects , you are probably correct. As far as efficiency for the consumer, to own, and operate, we aren't there yet. Sure, they work great for some people, but they won't for all, at the moment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2022, 09:08 AM
 
9,855 posts, read 4,634,723 times
Reputation: 7491
Virginia must follow the California regulations

Due to virtue signaling and ignorant Democrat Virginia legislatures Virginia enacted a law that says Virginia must follow California's lead/rules on emissions & cars. Yes Virginia no gas powered cars in 2035.

Governor Youngkin trying to do something about it.

https://www.13newsnow.com/article/mo...1-cec3e859c01f

Subcontracting regulatory authority/rules to another state? They couldn't come up with something themselves?

But the Democrats want to spread their policy like a disease and this is one way they'll try to do it.

Last edited by anononcty; 08-29-2022 at 09:34 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2022, 09:16 AM
 
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
5,067 posts, read 1,665,416 times
Reputation: 3144
California is looking for year round blackouts. Please keep all of the stupid in that state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2022, 09:16 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,960 posts, read 22,141,678 times
Reputation: 13795
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
Yea, but then so would drinkable water in most of Utah and Nevada.
That is a very silly argument. Water is needed to sustain all life, not just human life, all life. Neither the market nor the politicians decided that, the laws of nature decided that a billion years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2022, 09:32 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,960 posts, read 22,141,678 times
Reputation: 13795
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
Meh, thats not really true either.

I dont think people really care one way or another if a car is electric or gas. Ev's tend to just not have any style and come in 2 or 3 colors and the ones on the lot tend to be the premium ones because the cheapest ones were bought on day one. And yes, there is still a charging problem
That's a really silly position to take. Of course people care if they are buying an EV. Before people decide to buy an EV, they check to see whether their are enough charging stations near them. Will they need to pay to have one install at home, is there one at work, etc...

People do not wonder if gas stations near them to fuel their ICE car. They do care if there are not enough EV charging stations around. And it's not just whether the streets have enough charging stations. They will definitely need a dedicated charging station at home, and maybe one at work as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top