Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Europe
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-19-2021, 07:24 PM
DKM
 
Location: California
6,767 posts, read 3,855,314 times
Reputation: 6690

Advertisements

China will develop their own engines soon enough. Russian, Ukrainian based, it won't matter. But they seem to be having trouble getting it quite right.

Motor sich is definitely on the edge and it has been for quite a while. They have work, but it does not involve selling china engines. Its mostly about rebuilding the engines in service (which apparently is a lot of work, especially with helicopters around the world).

There is nothing inherently bad about it going back to being a state run enterprise, like its sister facility, Ivchenko Progress. I can't see Russia being mad about China not getting access to these engines. They are probably not thrilled about both companies involvement with Turkish drone engines, but like China, Turkey will develop their own eventually anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-19-2021, 10:49 PM
 
Location: Russia
2,216 posts, read 1,021,239 times
Reputation: 946
Quote:
Originally Posted by DKM View Post
It's tragic how much you base your Russian dreams on wishful thinking. Last year you guys were on here claiming Motor Sich is dead with no production. Now you are claiming they were making engines for China. Go ahead, refute my post with facts. You can't, all you can do is attack me because I don't live in Russian propaganda world. Russian propaganda has settled on the idea that Ukraine must be externally controlled since it clearly desires a Western orientation. We can't have Russians thinking that's what Ukrainians actually want can we.

As for the Russian junk, well:
https://www.thedefensepost.com/2021/...ighter-engine/

SCMP is owned by the biggest Pro China organization in the world.
Quote:
Despite the obstacles in the development of the WS-15, Chinese military aviation expert Andreas Rupprecht told Flight Global that the use of the domestic WS-10C in the aircraft is a " major breakthrough†because it will reduce China's dependence on Russian engines.
The Chinese want to have their own engine, which is perfectly normal.


That is, you do not read what you repost )))
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2021, 10:52 PM
 
Location: Russia
2,216 posts, read 1,021,239 times
Reputation: 946
Quote:
Originally Posted by DKM View Post
China has not purchased any "turbines" from Motor Sich. They want the technology because they had to ditch the inferior Russian junk they were trying to use in their "stealth" J-20 fighter. So they were buying the company from an oligarch to steal the technology. Ukraine is nationalizing the company to prevent it's valuable technology from falling into Chinese hands. Japan is showing its appreciation with new defense agreements and more new police vehicles to be delivered this year.
Don't deceive the public. Since 2014, there have been no oligarchs in Ukraine. You beat them all on the Maidan..Seven years have already passed . Or have you screwed up again in the full sense of the word ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2021, 10:57 PM
 
Location: Russia
2,216 posts, read 1,021,239 times
Reputation: 946
Quote:
Originally Posted by DKM View Post
China will develop their own engines soon enough. Russian, Ukrainian based, it won't matter. But they seem to be having trouble getting it quite right.

Motor sich is definitely on the edge and it has been for quite a while. They have work, but it does not involve selling china engines. Its mostly about rebuilding the engines in service (which apparently is a lot of work, especially with helicopters around the world).

There is nothing inherently bad about it going back to being a state run enterprise, like its sister facility, Ivchenko Progress. I can't see Russia being mad about China not getting access to these engines. They are probably not thrilled about both companies involvement with Turkish drone engines, but like China, Turkey will develop their own eventually anyway.
Of course they will.In less than half a century, they will definitely develop it. No one doubts it. But they will still buy Russian first-class engines. But there are no more Ukrainian engines and there won't be any more. It's sad to be a colony.Isn't that right DKM ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2021, 01:19 AM
DKM
 
Location: California
6,767 posts, read 3,855,314 times
Reputation: 6690
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turist View Post
Of course they will.In less than half a century, they will definitely develop it. No one doubts it. But they will still buy Russian first-class engines. But there are no more Ukrainian engines and there won't be any more. It's sad to be a colony.Isn't that right DKM ?
There are new engines being made in Ukraine for Ukrainian and Turkish built aircraft right now as I type this. Just not to China. A Chinese colony is Russia's goal, not Ukraine's. Is Ukraine going to be a major aircraft engine maker in the future? Probably not. Do they need to be? I think there are bigger fish to fry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2021, 01:22 AM
DKM
 
Location: California
6,767 posts, read 3,855,314 times
Reputation: 6690
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turist View Post
Don't deceive the public. Since 2014, there have been no oligarchs in Ukraine. You beat them all on the Maidan..Seven years have already passed . Or have you screwed up again in the full sense of the word ?
You're clearly not paying attention. One of the oligarchs was elected after the Maidan so, no. There are good and bad oligarchs, the ones who act normally are not the problem. If they reinvest in their plants and people and pay their taxes like Pinchuk, and Akhmetov, I personally don't see the problem. The ones who only make money Russian style (corrupt connections) are the problem. Once again the USA was not involved, so there is no "You" in your sentence that applies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2021, 08:16 AM
 
12,022 posts, read 11,568,432 times
Reputation: 11136
There's no real reason for China to go except the US threatened to place nukes in space.

US should be leader in weaponization in space

It's not something to be proud of. It's more to feed the beast, the US military-industrial complex. Meanwhile, US debt will reach 140% of GDP this year, well beyond when Yugoslavia, the Soviet Union, and Greece were forced into the austerity programs.

There are still areas rich in natural resources. Unfortunately, as the Exxon CEO recently stated, it resides in countries that are undergoing violent upheaval, making it difficult to get at. The fake War on Terror and the use of terrorism to disrupt the Belt and Road projects in the 2010's has exacerbated the problem. One of the stated goals of US policy is to make it difficult for a rising competitor to access natural resources.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2021, 08:32 AM
 
9,511 posts, read 5,437,689 times
Reputation: 9092
Exactly Ichoro. Resources are a big part of it that and the ability to menace rivals from certain places.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9pOQioOEGg&t=797s

Then there's investors which as you stated is a big part of the Ukraine mess. It's getting harder to open new markets in different places profitably so violence is used to displace one group and take over what they have then make it yours.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2021, 10:35 AM
 
26,783 posts, read 22,537,314 times
Reputation: 10037
Quote:
Originally Posted by DKM View Post
You're clearly not paying attention. One of the oligarchs was elected after the Maidan so, no. There are good and bad oligarchs, the ones who act normally are not the problem. If they reinvest in their plants and people and pay their taxes like Pinchuk, and Akhmetov, I personally don't see the problem. The ones who only make money Russian style (corrupt connections) are the problem. Once again the USA was not involved, so there is no "You" in your sentence that applies.




Priceless.

Yes indeed there are "good oligarchs" of Zlochevsky kind that invite Biden Juniors and Kwasnevskys of Poland on their companies' directors boards, and then there are bad ones that hook up with Russian oligarchs.


That was precisely Putin's logic, when he came to power back in..1999(?), that there were "good and bad oligarchs" in Russia - the ones serving his interests and American/Western interests.

He got rid of the latter ones, while keeping the "good ones" - the ones that were "acting normally and were not the problem."

After all they were "reinvesting in their plants" and stuff.



The stink about the "oligarchic kleptocracy" of Russia is up to heaven until this day in Western media, but "oligarchic kleptocracy" of Ukraine is not a problem - oh no.
It's all about the "young state striving for democracy," and only "bad oligarchs" are problematic.


The corporate democrats of America are so funny, and so are you DKM))))


P.S. BTW Turist was sarcastic saying that " there has been no oligarchy in Ukraine since 2014," but it has been lost on you.

Of course Russians are well aware that after the barrage of accusations in "corruption" hurled at Yanukovitch, the coup d'etat of 2014 threw Ukraine into the bottomless pit of oligarchic kleptocracy.

Starting with the newly-appointed oligarch Poroshenko as the head of the state, that apparently Mrs. Nuland found personally fit for a job.

Last edited by erasure; 03-20-2021 at 11:01 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2021, 12:32 PM
 
Location: Russia
2,216 posts, read 1,021,239 times
Reputation: 946
Quote:
Originally Posted by DKM View Post
There are new engines being made in Ukraine for Ukrainian and Turkish built aircraft right now as I type this. Just not to China. A Chinese colony is Russia's goal, not Ukraine's. Is Ukraine going to be a major aircraft engine maker in the future? Probably not. Do they need to be? I think there are bigger fish to fry.
Honestly honestly? Are they producing exactly? Or it's the same as always. We will someday produce,but there is no project,no documentation,no money, but there is a "memorandum of intent".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Europe
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top