Top 101 cities with largest percentage of females in occupations: Health diagnosing and treating practitioners and other technical occupations (population 50,000+)

Females (%) distibution for all U.S. cities (pop. 50,000+)

Top 101 cities with largest percentage of females in occupations: Health diagnosing and treating practitioners and other technical occupations (population 50,000+)

RankCityFemales (%)
1.
Missouri City, TX (housing) (pop. 70,185)18.8%
2.
Pearland, TX (housing) (pop. 100,065)18.7%
3.
Rochester, MN (housing) (pop. 110,742)18.3%
4.
Jonesboro, AR (housing) (pop. 71,551)14.8%
5.
Fishers, IN (housing) (pop. 83,891)14.1%
6.
Troy, MI (housing) (pop. 82,821)13.8%
7.
Redlands, CA (housing) (pop. 69,999)13.7%
8.
Tinley Park, IL (housing) (pop. 57,282)13.2%
9.
The Villages, FL (housing) (pop. 51,442)13.1%
10.
Catalina Foothills, AZ (housing) (pop. 50,796)12.9%
11.
New Rochelle, NY (housing) (pop. 79,446)12.5%
12.
Newton, MA (housing) (pop. 87,971)11.8%
13.
San Ramon, CA (housing) (pop. 74,513)11.7%
14.
Brookline, MA (housing) (pop. 58,732)11.6%
15.
Chino Hills, CA (housing) (pop. 76,572)11.5%
16.
Goodyear, AZ (housing) (pop. 72,864)11.5%
17.
Skokie, IL (housing) (pop. 65,176)11.3%
18.
Port Orange, FL (housing) (pop. 57,203)11.2%
19.
Mount Pleasant, SC (housing) (pop. 74,885)11.1%
20.
Union City, CA (housing) (pop. 72,528)11.1%
21.
Ankeny, IA (housing) (pop. 51,567)10.8%
22.
Chapel Hill, NC (housing) (pop. 59,635)10.8%
23.
Fargo, ND (housing) (pop. 113,658)10.7%
24.
Charleston, WV (housing) (pop. 50,821)10.7%
25.
League City, TX (housing) (pop. 90,983)10.7%
26.
Orland Park, IL (housing) (pop. 58,590)10.6%
27.
Highlands Ranch, CO (housing) (pop. 96,713)10.6%
28.
Eastvale, CA (housing) (pop. 55,191)10.6%
29.
Gaithersburg, MD (housing) (pop. 65,690)10.6%
30.
Hoover, AL (housing) (pop. 84,126)10.5%
31.
Bartlett, TN (housing) (pop. 58,226)10.3%
32.
Waukesha, WI (housing) (pop. 71,016)10.3%
33.
Little Rock, AR (housing) (pop. 197,357)10.3%
34.
Miramar, FL (housing) (pop. 130,288)10.2%
35.
Charleston, SC (housing) (pop. 127,999)10.2%
36.
Davis, CA (housing) (pop. 66,205)10.1%
37.
Bend, OR (housing) (pop. 81,236)10.1%
38.
O'Fallon, MO (housing) (pop. 82,809)10.0%
39.
Noblesville, IN (housing) (pop. 56,540)9.9%
40.
Greenville, NC (housing) (pop. 89,130)9.8%
41.
Palo Alto, CA (housing) (pop. 66,642)9.8%
42.
Johnson City, TN (housing) (pop. 65,123)9.8%
43.
West Hartford, CT (housing) (pop. 63,268)9.8%
44.
Oak Park, IL (housing) (pop. 52,066)9.7%
45.
Scottsdale, AZ (housing) (pop. 226,918)9.7%
46.
Temple, TX (housing) (pop. 70,190)9.6%
47.
Winston-Salem, NC (housing) (pop. 236,441)9.6%
48.
Flower Mound, TX (housing) (pop. 68,609)9.5%
49.
Casas Adobes, AZ (housing) (pop. 66,795)9.5%
50.
Gilbert, AZ (housing) (pop. 229,972)9.5%
51.
Ellicott City, MD (housing) (pop. 65,834)9.4%
52.
Roseville, CA (housing) (pop. 127,035)9.4%
53.
Kettering, OH (housing) (pop. 55,870)9.4%
54.
Iowa City, IA (housing) (pop. 71,591)9.4%
55.
Millcreek, UT (housing) (pop. 62,139)9.3%
56.
Towson, MD (housing) (pop. 55,197)9.3%
57.
Rochester Hills, MI (housing) (pop. 72,952)9.3%
58.
Mount Prospect, IL (housing) (pop. 54,771)9.3%
59.
Weymouth Town, MA (housing) (pop. 55,419)9.3%
60.
Asheville, NC (housing) (pop. 87,236)9.2%
61.
Lakeland, FL (housing) (pop. 100,710)9.1%
62.
Lexington-Fayette, KY (housing) (pop. 308,428)9.1%
63.
Pembroke Pines, FL (housing) (pop. 162,329)9.1%
64.
Silver Spring, MD (housing) (pop. 71,452)9.1%
65.
Clovis, CA (housing) (pop. 99,769)9.0%
66.
Jupiter, FL (housing) (pop. 58,298)9.0%
67.
Yorba Linda, CA (housing) (pop. 67,032)9.0%
68.
Greenville, SC (housing) (pop. 61,397)8.9%
69.
McKinney, TX (housing) (pop. 148,559)8.9%
70.
Salt Lake City, UT (housing) (pop. 191,180)8.8%
71.
Pittsburgh, PA (housing) (pop. 305,841)8.8%
72.
Lawrence, KS (housing) (pop. 90,811)8.8%
73.
Palm Harbor, FL (housing) (pop. 57,439)8.8%
74.
Shoreline, WA (housing) (pop. 54,790)8.8%
75.
Portland, ME (housing) (pop. 66,318)8.7%
76.
Springfield, IL (housing) (pop. 117,006)8.7%
77.
Arlington Heights, IL (housing) (pop. 75,994)8.7%
78.
St. Petersburg, FL (housing) (pop. 249,688)8.7%
79.
Bethesda, MD (housing) (pop. 60,858)8.7%
80.
Naperville, IL (housing) (pop. 144,864)8.7%
81.
Shreveport, LA (housing) (pop. 200,327)8.7%
82.
Madison, WI (housing) (pop. 243,344)8.6%
83.
Billings, MT (housing) (pop. 109,059)8.6%
84.
Chesapeake, VA (housing) (pop. 230,571)8.6%
85.
Southaven, MS (housing) (pop. 50,997)8.5%
86.
Davie, FL (housing) (pop. 96,830)8.5%
87.
Farmington Hills, MI (housing) (pop. 81,295)8.5%
88.
Diamond Bar, CA (housing) (pop. 56,449)8.5%
89.
Maple Grove, MN (housing) (pop. 65,415)8.5%
90.
Eagan, MN (housing) (pop. 65,453)8.4%
91.
Santa Clarita, CA (housing) (pop. 179,590)8.4%
92.
Lenexa, KS (housing) (pop. 50,344)8.4%
93.
Eden Prairie, MN (housing) (pop. 62,603)8.4%
94.
Columbia, MD (housing) (pop. 99,615)8.3%
95.
Lakewood, CA (housing) (pop. 81,121)8.3%
96.
Tyler, TX (housing) (pop. 100,223)8.3%
97.
Torrance, CA (housing) (pop. 147,478)8.3%
98.
Metairie, LA (housing) (pop. 138,481)8.3%
99.
Pasadena, CA (housing) (pop. 139,731)8.2%
100.
Peabody, MA (housing) (pop. 52,044)8.2%
101.
Sammamish, WA (housing) (pop. 50,169)8.2%
Also check out our website just for ranking top lists with best, worst, and most of everything: ShareRanks.com.
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.