Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Most Northern state?
Maine 21 13.91%
Vermont 8 5.30%
New Hampshire 0 0%
Massachusetts 37 24.50%
Rhode Island 0 0%
Connecticut 4 2.65%
New York 29 19.21%
Michigan 3 1.99%
Wisconsin 2 1.32%
Minnesota 43 28.48%
North Dakota 3 1.99%
South Dakota 0 0%
Nebraska 1 0.66%
Voters: 151. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-03-2018, 11:34 PM
 
Location: St. Louis Park, MN
7,733 posts, read 6,457,003 times
Reputation: 10399

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grizzly Addams View Post
BadgerFilms, I thoroughly enjoy watching you hype your new home state. Ghengis hasn't been pulling their weight lately and it's nice to see someone pick up the slack.

Keep it up!
Hey now, I have sacrificed a lot to come up here, I think I am entitled to a little hyping! I love this damn place, and yes it's very northern! Don't believe me? Just feel the damn wind!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-03-2018, 11:39 PM
 
Location: St. Louis Park, MN
7,733 posts, read 6,457,003 times
Reputation: 10399
Quote:
Originally Posted by geographybee View Post
My northern standards include:
Large, populous, educated city
Hilly country (farming or not)
Historical architecture
Liberal politics
Abundance of wealth
Solid Public transportation
Good good (particularly Italian food)
Large population of ethnic whites
Mild or colder weather

Based on this criteria, NYC is the heart of Northern identity. Boston is the heart of New England, Philly anchors the Mod-Atlantic, and DC anchors the Upper South and Lower Mid-Atlantic. NYC blends the New England and Mid-Atlantic culture to create a mix of both Northern cultures. It also best embodies the criteria above, which, IMP, are what come to mind when most Americans think of the North.
Sure I think a lot of those things are typically "northern" though I don't see why Italian food is that important? That's an east coast bias. Plus the South has better food (and more variety) hands down. I would add pine trees, giant lakes which freeze in winter, moose and deer in forests, lots of birches and maple trees. NY state is full of that as well but NYC? Northern yes but too eastern and also way too big. There's lots of poverty in the north it may not be to the levels of Mississippi but it's there. Look up Kiryas Joel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2018, 09:24 AM
 
Location: Twin Cities (StP)
3,051 posts, read 2,597,616 times
Reputation: 2427
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadgerFilms View Post
Hey now, I have sacrificed a lot to come up here, I think I am entitled to a little hyping! I love this damn place, and yes it's very northern! Don't believe me? Just feel the damn wind!!!
Yeah the wind is what gets ya. Today for instance is -3 with no wind, and it's wonderful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2018, 09:35 AM
 
14,020 posts, read 15,011,523 times
Reputation: 10466
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadgerFilms View Post
Hey now, I have sacrificed a lot to come up here, I think I am entitled to a little hyping! I love this damn place, and yes it's very northern! Don't believe me? Just feel the damn wind!!!
Texas is further South than South Carolina but SC is much more southern than Texas. It's how it is the culture of the North andSouth are defined by the East Coast states and they slowly bleed into "the West" and by the time you get to the West Coast the difference between North and South is very small compared to the East.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2018, 10:20 AM
 
4,792 posts, read 6,053,895 times
Reputation: 2729
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
Texas is further South than South Carolina but SC is much more southern than Texas. It's how it is the culture of the North andSouth are defined by the East Coast states and they slowly bleed into "the West" and by the time you get to the West Coast the difference between North and South is very small compared to the East.
But a place like the Delta is stereotypically called "the most Southern place on Earth" so how does the whole East Coast thing work there?

Also one of the reasons Texas isn't as "Southern" as South Carolina is its Mexican history. But the Midwest compared to the Northeast didn't have that. Everyone who settled the Midwest was American and from the Northeast.

It doesn't make the Midwest any less Northern.

Also, culturally the West isn't biased between North and South because historically the settlers of the West were also from the Northeast and the Midwest, with much less influence from the South. The Southern influence is still seen in places like Bakersfield however.

I understand the respective cultures originated in the colonies. However just like it is ridiculous to think Mississippi is less Southern than South Carolina it also is ridiculous to think Minnesota is less Northern than Massachusetts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2018, 01:04 PM
 
14,020 posts, read 15,011,523 times
Reputation: 10466
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieOlSkool View Post
But a place like the Delta is stereotypically called "the most Southern place on Earth" so how does the whole East Coast thing work there?

Also one of the reasons Texas isn't as "Southern" as South Carolina is its Mexican history. But the Midwest compared to the Northeast didn't have that. Everyone who settled the Midwest was American and from the Northeast.

It doesn't make the Midwest any less Northern.

Also, culturally the West isn't biased between North and South because historically the settlers of the West were also from the Northeast and the Midwest, with much less influence from the South. The Southern influence is still seen in places like Bakersfield however.

I understand the respective cultures originated in the colonies. However just like it is ridiculous to think Mississippi is less Southern than South Carolina it also is ridiculous to think Minnesota is less Northern than Massachusetts.
There is a huge difference between the demographic makeup of Massachusetts and Minnesota. They aren't the same peoples. Largely Northern Europeans settled in Minnesota and largely Southern Europeans and Irish settled in New England.

The difference between Texas and the Deep South has everything to do with Climate, it was totally unsuitable for large scale plantation agriculture like further east so it developed differently.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2018, 01:46 PM
 
239 posts, read 231,985 times
Reputation: 172
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadgerFilms View Post
Sure I think a lot of those things are typically "northern" though I don't see why Italian food is that important? That's an east coast bias. Plus the South has better food (and more variety) hands down. I would add pine trees, giant lakes which freeze in winter, moose and deer in forests, lots of birches and maple trees. NY state is full of that as well but NYC? Northern yes but too eastern and also way too big. There's lots of poverty in the north it may not be to the levels of Mississippi but it's there. Look up Kiryas Joel.
Italian food is important because it is a stereotype of the North to have good food, especially Italian. Also, the South does not have better food than the Nroth. The North can offer much more variety, and more ethnic cuisines. I agree that Southern food is delicious, but the North has better fine dining, Chinese, and Italian. I understand that there is lots of poverty in the North, but there is way more in the South. There is also way more wealth in the North compared to the South.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2018, 01:50 PM
 
4,792 posts, read 6,053,895 times
Reputation: 2729
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
There is a huge difference between the demographic makeup of Massachusetts and Minnesota. They aren't the same peoples. Largely Northern Europeans settled in Minnesota and largely Southern Europeans and Irish settled in New England.

The difference between Texas and the Deep South has everything to do with Climate, it was totally unsuitable for large scale plantation agriculture like further east so it developed differently.
Demographically neither Massachusetts nor Minnesota are "Yankee" since the English ancestry in both states is a minority. So I am not sure how having more Irish/Italians makes a place more Northern than having more Germans/Norwegians. How is any of this relevant to determining how Northern a place is?

How does Minnesota being more Germanic make it less Northern than Massachusetts which is more mixed? I don't get where you are going with this. Today, the demographics of each state are low on actual English ancestry anyway.

I understand the Texas argument but you didn't address my point about Mississippi which is arguably one of the most Southern places and isn't on the Coast nor is it an original part of the 13 colonies.

So again, what makes Minnesota less Northern than Massachusetts? Less Italians? What? Many of these groups weren't even really as prominent around the time the North/South identities were drawn anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2018, 01:54 PM
 
4,792 posts, read 6,053,895 times
Reputation: 2729
Quote:
Originally Posted by geographybee View Post
Italian food is important because it is a stereotype of the North to have good food, especially Italian. Also, the South does not have better food than the Nroth. The North can offer much more variety, and more ethnic cuisines. I agree that Southern food is delicious, but the North has better fine dining, Chinese, and Italian. I understand that there is lots of poverty in the North, but there is way more in the South. There is also way more wealth in the North compared to the South.
A stereotype to who? Your own perception? I don't know anyone that stereotypes the North as having better food. Most certainly not Southerners. Northerners believing one thing about themselves isn't exactly a stereotype.

And again, are Italians a magical determinant of Northern identity? What do you make of the fact the mob had a very strong presence in New Orleans?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2018, 02:09 PM
 
14,020 posts, read 15,011,523 times
Reputation: 10466
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieOlSkool View Post
Demographically neither Massachusetts nor Minnesota are "Yankee" since the English ancestry in both states is a minority. So I am not sure how having more Irish/Italians makes a place more Northern than having more Germans/Norwegians. How is any of this relevant to determining how Northern a place is?

How does Minnesota being more Germanic make it less Northern than Massachusetts which is more mixed? I don't get where you are going with this. Today, the demographics of each state are low on actual English ancestry anyway.

I understand the Texas argument but you didn't address my point about Mississippi which is arguably one of the most Southern places and isn't on the Coast nor is it an original part of the 13 colonies.

So again, what makes Minnesota less Northern than Massachusetts? Less Italians? What? Many of these groups weren't even really as prominent around the time the North/South identities were drawn anyway.
Because Germanic ethnic groups are the biggest everywhere except for the Northeast. Its a specifically Northern Trait, Religiously is Protestant like the South vs Catholic like the Eastern Part of the North.

Mississippi is a direct extension of the east coast, they simply ran out of land to cultivate (or exhausted it due to lack of crop rotation). Compared to the Northeast and Midwest that always had distinctly different industries. In fact the South made a concerted effort to "colonize" the western reaches of the South to make is as similar as possible to the "Old South" (look at Bleeding Kansas), that was not the case in the North were people went were they went randomly, and often it wasn't even Americans but Germans passing through straight to the Midwest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top