Detached units distibution for all U.S. cities (20,000+ housing units)
Top 101 cities with the largest percentage of one, detached housing units in structures (20,000+ housing units) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rank | City | Detached units |
| 1. | Deltona, FL (housing) (pop. 86,290) | 95.2% |
| 2. | Redford, MI (housing) (pop. 49,678) | 93.2% |
| 3. | Big Bear, CA (housing) (pop. 28,837) | 91.6% |
| 4. | Spring Hill, FL (housing) (pop. 98,621) | 88.9% |
| 5. | Dearborn Heights, MI (housing) (pop. 56,620) | 88.3% |
| 6. | Sugar Land, TX (housing) (pop. 83,860) | 88.2% |
| 7. | Livonia, MI (housing) (pop. 95,208) | 87.8% |
| 8. | Gilbert, AZ (housing) (pop. 229,972) | 86.9% |
| 9. | Port Charlotte, FL (housing) (pop. 54,392) | 86.8% |
| 10. | Port St. Lucie, FL (housing) (pop. 171,016) | 85.8% |
| 11. | East Contra Costa, CA (housing) (pop. 78,216) | 85.7% |
| 12. | Deer Valley, AZ (housing) (pop. 186,030) | 85.2% |
| 13. | Broken Arrow, OK (housing) (pop. 103,500) | 85.0% |
| 14. | Highlands Ranch, CO (housing) (pop. 96,713) | 84.6% |
| 15. | Penn Hills, PA (housing) (pop. 44,614) | 84.1% |
| 16. | Barnstable Town, MA (housing) (pop. 47,607) | 84.1% |
| 17. | Rio Rancho, NM (housing) (pop. 91,956) | 84.1% |
| 18. | Moreno Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 201,175) | 83.4% |
| 19. | South El Dorado, CA (housing) (pop. 87,572) | 83.0% |
| 20. | Sandy, UT (housing) (pop. 90,231) | 82.8% |
| 21. | Enid, OK (housing) (pop. 50,725) | 82.8% |
| 22. | East Canadian, OK (housing) (pop. 72,697) | 82.6% |
| 23. | Toms River, NJ (housing) (pop. 88,791) | 81.5% |
| 24. | Lakewood, CA (housing) (pop. 81,121) | 81.4% |
| 25. | Chino Hills, CA (housing) (pop. 76,572) | 80.9% |
| 26. | Northeast Cobb, GA (housing) (pop. 169,756) | 80.6% |
| 27. | St. Clair Shores, MI (housing) (pop. 60,070) | 80.5% |
| 28. | Hesperia, CA (housing) (pop. 92,147) | 80.4% |
| 29. | Irondequoit, NY (housing) (pop. 51,692) | 80.0% |
| 30. | Fairfield, CT (housing) (pop. 59,404) | 79.1% |
| 31. | The Woodlands, TX (housing) (pop. 93,847) | 79.1% |
| 32. | Loomis Basin-Folsom Lake, CA (housing) (pop. 89,014) | 78.9% |
| 33. | South Antelope Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 171,490) | 78.5% |
| 34. | Florissant, MO (housing) (pop. 52,363) | 78.4% |
| 35. | Suffolk, VA (housing) (pop. 85,728) | 78.3% |
| 36. | Palm Bay, FL (housing) (pop. 104,898) | 78.0% |
| 37. | East Jefferson, TX (housing) (pop. 111,383) | 78.0% |
| 38. | North Cleveland, OK (housing) (pop. 102,211) | 77.8% |
| 39. | Parma, OH (housing) (pop. 80,429) | 77.4% |
| 40. | Lake Havasu City, AZ (housing) (pop. 52,844) | 76.9% |
| 41. | Cape Coral, FL (housing) (pop. 165,831) | 76.5% |
| 42. | Edmond, OK (housing) (pop. 87,004) | 76.3% |
| 43. | Warren, MI (housing) (pop. 134,873) | 76.2% |
| 44. | Palmdale, CA (housing) (pop. 157,161) | 76.2% |
| 45. | Antioch, CA (housing) (pop. 107,100) | 76.1% |
| 46. | Youngstown, OH (housing) (pop. 65,184) | 76.0% |
| 47. | West Bloomfield Township, MI (housing) (pop. 65,149) | 75.4% |
| 48. | Jurupa, CA (housing) (pop. 112,225) | 75.1% |
| 49. | Flint, MI (housing) (pop. 99,763) | 74.9% |
| 50. | Lee's Summit, MO (housing) (pop. 93,184) | 74.8% |
| 51. | Saginaw, MI (housing) (pop. 50,303) | 74.7% |
| 52. | Roseville, MI (housing) (pop. 47,555) | 74.7% |
| 53. | Port Arthur, TX (housing) (pop. 54,135) | 74.5% |
| 54. | Simi Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 126,181) | 74.2% |
| 55. | Apple Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 70,924) | 74.2% |
| 56. | Southeast Harris, TX (housing) (pop. 93,921) | 74.1% |
| 57. | Roseville, CA (housing) (pop. 127,035) | 74.1% |
| 58. | North Davis, UT (housing) (pop. 179,550) | 74.0% |
| 59. | Waterford, MI (housing) (pop. 73,473) | 74.0% |
| 60. | Fontana, CA (housing) (pop. 203,003) | 73.9% |
| 61. | South Davis, UT (housing) (pop. 106,781) | 73.8% |
| 62. | North Hempstead, NY (housing) (pop. 226,322) | 73.8% |
| 63. | Joplin, MO (housing) (pop. 50,789) | 73.7% |
| 64. | Mission Viejo, CA (housing) (pop. 96,346) | 73.5% |
| 65. | Pine Bluff, AR (housing) (pop. 46,094) | 73.3% |
| 66. | Norwalk, CA (housing) (pop. 106,589) | 73.3% |
| 67. | Troy, MI (housing) (pop. 82,821) | 73.2% |
| 68. | East Grayson, TX (housing) (pop. 86,658) | 73.1% |
| 69. | Warwick, RI (housing) (pop. 81,971) | 73.1% |
| 70. | Miramar, FL (housing) (pop. 130,288) | 73.1% |
| 71. | Casper, WY (housing) (pop. 59,628) | 73.0% |
| 72. | Peoria, AZ (housing) (pop. 162,592) | 72.7% |
| 73. | Decatur, IL (housing) (pop. 74,710) | 72.7% |
| 74. | Livermore, CA (housing) (pop. 85,156) | 72.7% |
| 75. | South Bend, IN (housing) (pop. 100,886) | 72.7% |
| 76. | Southwest Orange, FL (housing) (pop. 125,117) | 72.7% |
| 77. | Midwest City, OK (housing) (pop. 56,756) | 72.6% |
| 78. | Petaluma, CA (housing) (pop. 59,440) | 72.6% |
| 79. | North Las Vegas, NV (housing) (pop. 226,877) | 72.2% |
| 80. | Pueblo, CO (housing) (pop. 108,249) | 72.2% |
| 81. | South Westside, FL (housing) (pop. 99,883) | 72.2% |
| 82. | Arvada, CO (housing) (pop. 111,707) | 72.0% |
| 83. | Concord, NC (housing) (pop. 83,506) | 71.9% |
| 84. | Central Pasco, FL (housing) (pop. 69,995) | 71.8% |
| 85. | Shoreline, WA (housing) (pop. 54,790) | 71.6% |
| 86. | Taylor, MI (housing) (pop. 61,817) | 71.5% |
| 87. | Mesquite, TX (housing) (pop. 143,484) | 71.4% |
| 88. | Victorville, CA (housing) (pop. 121,096) | 71.4% |
| 89. | Clarkstown, NY (housing) (pop. 84,187) | 71.4% |
| 90. | Independence, MO (housing) (pop. 117,240) | 71.2% |
| 91. | Brandon, FL (housing) (pop. 103,483) | 71.2% |
| 92. | Vacaville, CA (housing) (pop. 94,275) | 71.2% |
| 93. | Castro Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 61,388) | 71.2% |
| 94. | Visalia, CA (housing) (pop. 127,763) | 71.2% |
| 95. | Garland, TX (housing) (pop. 234,566) | 71.1% |
| 96. | Lawton, OK (housing) (pop. 97,151) | 71.0% |
| 97. | Rialto, CA (housing) (pop. 101,910) | 71.0% |
| 98. | Chandler, AZ (housing) (pop. 249,146) | 70.9% |
| 99. | North Little Rock, AR (housing) (pop. 66,075) | 70.8% |
| 100. | Northwest Harris, TX (housing) (pop. 464,301) | 70.8% |
| 101. | Northwest Dade, FL (housing) (pop. 113,920) | 70.7% |